About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-193588 1 (1979-04-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadhct0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




DECISION





FILE:   B-193588


          THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
Z  ad  OF THE UNITED STATES
          WASHINGTON, D. C. 20548


IDATE:  April 10, 1979


MATTER OF: Grace .. Woodring - Salary Rate   Upon Reemployme t


DIGEST: Employee   who had been previously.employed by CS at
           GS-5, step 6, requested and was given assurances
           that she would be reemployed at the GS-5, step 10,
           rate. Upon being reemployed employee discovered
           that her pay was set at GS-5, step 6, in accordance
           with requirement in 5 C.F.R. § 531.203(c). Em-
           ployee's claim for pay at the higher rate is dis-
           allowed. Section 531.203(c) prohibits reemployment
           of employee in excess of highest previous rate and
           even though officials may have mislead employee,
           they acted beyond scope of their authority and
           cannot bind Government. Also, GAO has no authority
           to grant equitable relief in violation of a
           regulation.


     Ms. Grace R. Woodring, an employee of the Community Services
Administration (CSA), Region IV, has requested a decision on her
claim that she should be paid at the GS-5, step 10, rate instead
of the GS-5, step 6, rate. Ms. Woodring was reemployed by CSA
on August 13, 1978, at grade GS-5, step 6, at $11,619 per annum,
after a period of employment in the-private sector, Ms. Woodring
believes she is entitled to the pay for step 10 of GS-5 since on
her application for employment, SF 171, she stated that the
lowest pay she would accept with CSA was $12,947 per annum. The
salary of $12,947 per annum was the GS-5, step 10, rate at that
time.

     The position for which Ms. Woodring applied was that of a
Clerk (typing), GS-0301-05. Although the letter informing
Ms. Woodring of her selection for that position did not indicate
any step to which she would be entitled, she alleges that a
Personnel Management Specialist in Region IV's Personnel Office
assured her prior to her acceptance of the position that her
requested salary level was OK. Upon receipt of her first pay
check from CSA, Ms. Woodring discovered that she had actually
been employed and paid at the GS-5, step 6, rate.

     Ms. Woodring states that due to her pressed financial
situation she would never have left her real estate job to work


r0c)  k

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most