About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-193522 1 (1979-01-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadgwi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



DECISION





FILE:  B-1935


      -THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL~
SOF THE UNITEO STATES
     W~ AASHINGTON, 0. C. 20548
       ~  ~~-<#,q


DATE: January 30, 1979


MATTER   OF:  Joseph Fortuna - Retroactive Temporary
              Promotion


DIGEST:






.CE/.,'ee


A Navy employee was reassigned to a
position at the same grade level and oc-
cupational series as his previous position
(Computer `.-stems Analyst GS-334-11).
Later he was reassigned to another
similar position. Although the employee
performed some  GS-12 duties, he is
not entitled to a retroactive promotion W4e
slr  he was never assigned to a position
classified and established at a higher
grade than his first position]


   This matter is in response to the request of Mr. Joseph Fortuna
to reconsider the denial of his claim of a retroactive temporary
promotion from a GS-11 position to a GS-12 position based on an
alleged detail to a GS-12 position during the period January 1972 to
October 13, 1974. The .Jam was denied by our Claims Division in
its Settlement Certificate Z-2789991, September 26, 1978.

   The  record indicates that Mr. Fortuna is employed by the Navy
Fleet Material Support Office, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania. While
employed there he was reassigned between January 23, 1972, and
August 5, 1973, as Computer Systems Analyst GS-334-11. His pre-
vious position bore the position number 5945, Code 96143. The
position to which he was reassigned had the position number 10098,
Code 96173. From  August 5, 1973, to October 13, 1974, Mr. Fortuna
was assigned to the position of Computer Systems Analyst, GS-334-11,
position number 5944.    -positions were officially classified and
established at the GS-1_. ad. e level in the same occupational series,
Computer Systems Anal-   (2-334. During the entire period of the
claim Mr. Fortuna work,    the same project and performed some
duties at a performance level not normally expected of a GS-11.

   Although Mr. Fortuna's duties may have warranted a higher
grade, there is no evidc. uof reclassification actions officially
establishing the positions .c1pied by him at grade GS-12 between
January 23, 1972, and CLa h  13, 1974. Since Mr. Fortuna was
assigned to GS-11 positi.-o: .ring the period of his claim and not
detailed to any GS-12 ple  , he is not entitled to a retroactive


_D


22

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most