About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-192890 1 (1979-01-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadgut0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                     0 ~  ~.THE   COMPTROLLER GENERAL64-cA0
  DECISION                 . OF   THE   UNITED STATES
                             WASHINGTON, D. C. 20546



  FILE:   B-192890                 DATE:  January 10, 1.979

  MATTER   OF:   Mr.  Edward F. Slibowski


  DIGEST:     The entitlement of a general schedule employee
              upon transfer to receive pay in his new position -
              based on his highest previous rate is discretionary
              with the agency (5 C. F. R. 531. 203(c)) and suiect V
              to agency regulations. App1-icable -xeg4atiens
              require& a minimum of 90 days service in an
              unlimited position in order for'mployee to receiveT
              full benefit of tha. grade and step as his highest
              previous rate for purpose of establishing his new
              rate on downgrading. Where an employee had not
              served 90 days in the higher grade) but was errone-
              ously given full benefits under the highest previous
              rate rule,ction administratively taken to correct a
              error and adjusf4mployee's rate of pay from
              step 10 to step 9 of grade GS-9, was proper.


    This action is in response to a letter dated June 13, 1978, from
Mr.  Edward F. Slibowski, requesting a review of his claim for retro-
active salary adjustment which was disallowed by our Claims Division
settlement dated March 18, 1976.

   Mr.  Slibowski questions the determination made with respect to
his transfer of April 2, 1967, to Sharpe Army Depot, Lathrop,
California, in connection with which he accepted a change from
grade GS-11, step 4, to the position of Production Controller (Auto-
motive) GS-9, step 10. He does not believe the action to correct
that transfer by changing step 10 to step 9, was correct.

   His claim for additional pay as a transferred General Schedule
employee was disallowed on the basis that when a General Schedule
employee moves  into a position by any means other than a new
appointment, he may be paid at any rate not exceeding his highest
previous rate computed based on a regular tour of duty under
an appointment not limited to 90 days, or for a continuous period
of not less than 90 days. Since he had not served in the GS-11,
step 4, position for a minimum of 90 days, it was concluded that
he was not entitled to have his new pay established based on that
higher rate.


   Secti6n 5334 of title 5, United States Code (Supp. III, 1967)
provided that the Civil Service Commission shall provide


tf-l

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most