About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-192556 1 (1978-12-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadgto0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                        THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION                OF   THE   UNITED STATES
                        WASHINGTON,  . C. 20549


B-192556


MATTER  OF:


DIGEST:


DATE:  December 4, 1978


William Wilder-5Arbitration Award of
Retroactive Promotion and Backpay


DJmployee, who had been employed in, a1
  grade GS-5 position for 8 months, did
  not receiveopromotion in career-ladder
  position until 13 other tjainees were
  promoted after 1 year ingareer-ladder
  position.nt itrator awarded promotion
  with backpay retroactive to date employee
  received within-grade increase in grade
  GS-5. Award, which is based upon violation
  of provision requiring equal opportunity
  in promotion program, may not be implemented
  since absence of nondiscretionary agency
  policy requiring promotion will not support
  award of retroactive promotion with backpay.


    This action is in response to a request from the
Federal Labor Relations Council, dated July 26, 1978,
for an advance decision concerninq the legality of
implementing the backpay award of an arbitrator in the
matter of American Federation of Government Employees,
Local 1760 and Northeastern Program Service Center
(TfT,   Arbitrator), FLRC No. 77A-31. The arbltrator
found that the agency, the Social Security Administration
(SSA), was not justified in delaying the career-ladder
promotion of an employee, Mr. William Wilder, and
the arbitrator awarded him a retroactive promotion
with backpay.

    The FLRC had initially, on August 26, 1977, denied
the agency's petition for review of the award because
it failed to meet the FLRC's requirements for review
set forth in 5 C.F.R. § 2411.32. Subsequent to the
FLRC's denial of review, we issued a decision in
Janice Levy, B-190408, December 21, 1977, in which
we invalidated an arbitrator's award of a retroactive
promotion made under similar circumstances. Based on
that decision, the SSA asked the FLRC to reconsider
its denial of review in the present case. The FLRC
granted the agency's reouest for reconsideration and
accepted its petition for review of the arbitrator's


FILE:

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most