About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-192283 1 (1978-11-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadgok0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                                            -..   .

                         THE COMPTROLLER aENERAL /2'/C-
DECISION                 OF  TH.EP M UNITEC  BTATEU
                         SWADMINGTON. 0.C . 2O54U



FILE:      0-192283           DATE:    November 15, 1978

MATTER  OF:       L. Mitchell Dick--Waiver of Overpayment
                  of Pay

DIGEST:        Employee was erroneously overpaid salary
               incidenL to granting of within-grade
               increase to step 5 prior to completion of
               104 weeks of service in step 4. Request
               for waiver of overpayment under 5 U.S.C.
               5 55S4 (1976) is denied since employee is
               not without fault in failing to question
               significant unexplaineid increase in pay
               or to verify correctness of compensation
               through payroll documents and earnings
               statemonts furnisned to him by employing
               agency.

     This action is in respdnse to the appeal by
Mr. L. Mitchell Dick of the denial by our Claims Division
of his application for waiver of an erroneous overpayment
of compenkation in the amount of $700.80. The overpayment
resulted from the grantinq of a within-orade increase
prior to comoletion of the prescribed waiting period
between sten increases.

     Mr. Dick, an employee of Ehe General Accountin Office,
received a within-arade increase to grade GS-16. step 3,
effective April 27, 1975, and another within-grade increase
to grade GS-16, step 4., effective April 25, 1976. Due to
a statutory pay adjustment effective February 27, 1977,
Mr. Dick's annual salary rate as a grade GS-16, step 4,
was increased from $39,600 to $43,592. Finally, effective
April 24, 1977, 11r. Dick received a within-grade increase
to grade GS-16, step 5. This last action was erroneous
since the minimum waiting period for increases from step 4
to step 54is 104 weeks rather than 52 weeks. See 5 U.S.C.
S 5335(a)(2) (1976).

     The erroneous step increase resulted lu an increase in
Mr. Dick's net pay of over $25 per pay period. As a result
of this error, Mr. Dick was overpaid from April 24 through
No';ember 19, 1977, in the total amoun& of $700.80. The
error was discovered by the employee in November 1977,
while he was doinq preliminary preparation of his 1977
income tax returns and was promptly reported to the
appropriate officials.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most