About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-191676 1 (1978-11-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadgnw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 






                           6  THE  COMPTPrLLOR GENERAL
 DECISIO      N   ...a             TH     uNITHO      8STATr1


                                                          fc

 FILE:  1-191676                     DATE:    November 2; 1978

 MATTER OF:      Lucki S. Latiier - Forfeiture of Lease
                 Deposit

 DIGEST:    Employee who forfeited $112.50 of a rental
            deposit for the lease of a residence at his
            neiw duty station after receiving notice of
            cancellation ef transfer, may be reimbursed
            forfeited amount as a miscellaneous expense.

     This action is it response to an appeal by Lucki S. Latimer
of our Claims Division setrlement dated June 14, 1977, disallowing
his claim for reimbursement of a rental deposIt for the lease of
a residence at his new duty station.

     The record shows that Mr. Latimer was issued Travel Order
CA-246-75, dated May 9, 1975, authorizing a trauGfer of duty
station from Dallas, Texas, to-Albuquerque, New Mexico, effec-
tive June'4, 1975.  The travel order.authorized a house-hunting
trip.  While on thehose-hunting   trip Mr. Latimer signed a
lease for a new-reuidence ou May 1?, '1975, givitU3 a 1-month
rental deposit of $225 plus'a security deposit of $75. On
May 22, 1975, Mr. Latimer was notified that his transfer had
been cancelled and was requested to close all accounts and
submit a voucher fo- all axpenses.  On May 28, 1975, the land-
lord of the newly rented house refunded all but $112.50 of the
combined deposits made, claiming the withheld amount as earned
rent.  It is the unrefunded amount of $112.50 for which
Mr. Latimer claims reimbursement.

     Mr. Latimer contends that his forfeiture was a miscellaneous
e.pense, ard as such, reimbursement should be allowed.     Under
the miscellaneous expense t'eory and the applicable regulations,
mAinly.pa a. 2-3.2 and pa    2-3.3 of the Federal Travel Regu-
lations  (FTMR 101-7, May'..43), we would not object to the
$112.50 deposit forfefid  being included as a miscellaneous
dllowance incident to Mr. Latimer's cancelled transfer to
Albuquerque.  See B-190764, April 14, 1978. He  is, therefore,
entitled  to reimbursement of the deposit forfeited as miscel-
laneous expenses.
















                              I4I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most