About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-167886,B-174985 1 (1978-06-01)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadgcg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 






                                      I THE CONMPTROLLER GENERAL
                C.ECISIOl                OF  THE   UNITED STATES
                                         WALJHINGTOld. D.C. 205419



                FILE:   8-167886, B-1749P5    DATE:  June 1, 1978

                MATTER  OF:     Federal Contractors


                DIGEST:
                        Setoff of payments retained under contract
                        against debts owedGovernment by performance
                        bond surety that completed contract is proper
                        even though surety is being liquidated in State
                        court proceeding, since debts and-credits
                        being set off accrued before commencement
                        of liquidation proceeding.


                        The Indiana Department of Insurance (Indiana)
                   has alpealed the settlement of our Claims Division
                   in the case of Federal Contractors, Inc. (Federal),
                   B-16788C, B-174985, April 9, 1976.

                        Federal was awarded contract No. DABFl5-70-C-0097
                  by  the Department of the Army (Army). When Federal
                  defaulted, the surety under the performance bond,
                  United Bonding Tnsurance Company (UBIC), completed
                  the contract irork. Contract payments in the amount of
                  $22,116.06 were retained by the Government. The Army
                  assessed, under the contract, liquidated damages of
                  $4,060, damages for inspection costs of $272.24 and
                  damages of $25 for cleaning the work area. This amount
                  was  set off against the $22,116.06, leaving $17,758.82
                  still owed under the contract.

                       While UBIC did not assert a claim for the retained
                  funds, ics right to them as a completing surety under
                  a performance bond was recognized. Trinity Universal
                  Coman   v. United States, 382 F.2d 317 (1967). Our
                  Claims Divisfoin 4etermined that the retained funds
                  were proper fo: setaff against debts owed the United
                  States by UBIC under other contracts. Since UBIC's
                  debts exceeded the amount retained, the entire amount
                  was set off.



       -                                   11





LK-

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most