About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-64193 1 (1978-03-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadfue0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                                                   Lens .e Wilcox


                   0  4'    THE  COMPTROLLM2R GENERAL

                            WASHINGTON. D.C. 20E40



 FILE:   B-64193                  DATE: ,March  14, 1978

 MIATTER  OF:   Adolph B. Amster  - Lodging Cost, Gift


 OlGEST:   Navy  empl oyee who lodges without cost
           at home of friend while on temporary*
           duty may not be reimibursed $30 spent
           for a gift for host and for taking host to
           dinner, Although the giving of a gratuity
           under such circumstances mnay be cus-
           tomary,  thec cost of such gift or m-eal is
           unr elated o the additional cust occasioned
           the host by the employee's stay and cannot
           be considered a lodging cost. 55 Comp.
           Gen. 956 (1976); 56 Comp. Gen. 321 (1977).

    This decision is rendered in response to Mr. Adolph B.
Amster's  request for reconsideration of our Claims Division's
denial of his claim for $30 in lieu of lodging costs. By travel
order dated August 18, 1975, Mr. Amster, an employee of the
Department  of the Navy, was assigned Vo temporary duty at
Los Alamos,  New Mexico,  and China Lake, California. From
September  7 to '3O, 1975, wbile'at China Lakc, Mr. Amster did
not occupy commercial lodgings but stayed in te home of friends,
Although Mr. Amster  did not incur any lodging costs on those
dates, he claims reimbursement in lieu of lodging cost\. for $30
spent for a gift and meals. He has provided a receipt for $13. 52
for a gift he purchased for bis hosts and has explained that the
balance of $16.48 was expended for meals for his hosts.

    Mr. Amste-'s claim for reimbursement was disallowed by
our Claims Division in Settlement Certificate Z-2618570,
October 12, 1977, on the basis that the expenditures involved
were not for lodgings but were in the nature of a personal ex-
pression of appreciation for the hospitality extended him. Be
takes exception to the disallowance, pointing out that if his
friends had charged him for staying in their home L ,ould have
been reimbursed for those charges. Explaining that he believes
it is not reasonable for a friend or relative to charge for hospi-
tality, he states that it is a matter of common courtusy for a
house guest to provide a gift or to take his or her host to dinner
and that such costs should be reimbursed. He adds that he per-
sonally would not considnr staying with friends without giving a


L-


*f..d.*.A I
--A

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most