About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-190902 1 (1978-02-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadfry0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

I1


DECISIC


FILE:   B-190

MATTER O


DHGIEL T:


I


             2.  Since FT  precludes reimbursement of
                 insurance expenses, except for mortgag3
                 title insurance, employee may not be
                 reimbursed for portion of real estate
                 broker's fee attributable to insurance
                 premium protecting purchaser.

     This matter arises from a request for an advance decision sub-
mitted Uy Donald C. Osttehr,  an authorizcd certifying officer of
the Department of Energy (DOE), regarding the propriety of reimburs-
ing an additional 1 percent real estate broker's commission to a
transferred employee.

     Mr. Donald J. Jolovich was transferred from Las Vegas, Nevada,
to Germantown, Maryland, 3s autho.ttzed on form HQ-279, Request and
Authorization for Official Thavel, dated June 14, 1974. Incident
to the transfer, Mr. Jolovich sold his residence in Las Vegas,
Nevada.  He paid his broker a 7 percent commission of $2,625, but
was reimbursed for only 6 percent or $2,250. He has claimed reim-
bursement for $375, representing the additional 1 percent commission.

     The DOE's refusal to reimburse in excess of 6 percent was
based on a determination by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) regarding the customary and normal real estate
commission charged by brokers in the Las Vegas area. By letter
dated August 13, 1974, HUD stated it had found 6 percent to bp the


W


4rpp


A


- L.


J


j


4-------


pop


                                        Lynn Caylor

                 THIE Cr'lPTRoLLE              AAL
 IN .OP               TwO    UNITEr           ..M
                 WABMINOTON.         D.D0    0   4 OB4




902                    DATE:    ftbruary 14, 1978

    Donald J. Jolovich - Real Estate Broker's
    Commission

1.  Transferred employee seeks reimbursement
    of full amount of 7 percent real estate
    broker's commission paid when he sold
    hia residence at his former duty station.
    Local HUD office states that 6 percent
    was prevailing rate. Although employen
    contends he was belatedly advised of
    HUD determination, he wan on constructive
    notice of FTR provision that reimburse-
    ment of broker's fees may not exceed
    the prevailing rate which mey be deter-
    mined on basis of HUD statement. Claim
    is denied.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most