HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.
![handle is hein.gao/gaobadfqw0001 and id is 1 raw text is:
. ,, Ala Zuakeman L2
'fl , THE C06gPTNOLLER GENERAL
L/ ga gagg . f .OF THE UNITED NTATNHE
S *WABMI4NGTODN, D. C.a2u548
WIT'0
FILE: B-189784 DATE: ftbruSly 1, 1978
MATTER OF:
United States Management,
Incorporated-Reconsideration
DIGEST:
Prirr decision holding that evaluation of
proposals was not improper is affirmed where
request for reconsideration only raises m'ttrs
previously considered and no showing is made of
erroneous legal conclusions.
United States Management, Incorporated (USM)
requests teconsideration of 'our decision dated
DecembeL 21, 1977, in which 4e denied the firm's
protest after concluding, inter alia, that a
Department of Labor solicitation advised offerors
that award will be based on equally weighted tech-
nicel ard price considerations.
As a basis for its request, USM claims that this
Office 'has ignored the fact that the Department of
Labor ex post facto assign[ed] a 50-50 evaluation
criteria for technical and cost, and that this Office
did not consider the contracting officer's failure
tc.,prepare a comparative point rating on a combined
technical and cost evaluation for the proposals. USM
requests we record the precise technical and cost
ratings for USM and for Science Management, Incorporated
(SKI), the successful offeror, to provide a basis
for judicial review.
USM is essentially raising matters which we
considered in our review of the evaluation that was
conducted in this case. In our prior decision, we
held that:
* * * where the 'solcitatior s.ated
that 'major consideration shil be
given to the evaluation of technical
proposals, as well as price,' it is
reasonable to conclude from this that
both factors were to be accorded
-------11-](ViewImageLocal?handle=hein.gao/gaobadfqw0001&div=1&collection=&method=preview&ext=.png&size=3)