About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-189782 1 (1978-02-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadfpc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




2j~ 'A'T>


DCSIDd\


THE  COMPTAr2LLE GENIF-RAL
S F  THE   UNITLD STATEB
WASHINGTON  . .C. 005 4


FILE:    1-

MATTER   0


DIGEST:


1897P 


DATF:  February 3, 1978


F'  Department of Interior - Overtime Pay for Pre-
    vailing lA-te Employees Who Negotiate Their Wages

 1, Section 9(b) of Puii. L. 92-302, August 19,
    1972, 5 U.S.,C. § 5343 note, governing
    prevailing rate ?Imlploy ees, exempts certain
    wage setting pr ovisions of enrtain bargaining
    agreements from the operation of that law.
    However, bction 9(b) does not exempt agree-
    ment provisions from the operation of other
    iaws or provide independent authorization
    for agreement provisions requiring expenditure
    of appropriated funds not authorized by any law.

2.  Department of interior questions whether it may
    pay overtime compensation to prervWling rate
    employeeti, who negotiate their wages, for work-
    free meal periods during overtime or alterna-
    tively for meal periods preempted by overtime
    work when employees are credited with an
    additional 30 minutes of overtime after they are
    released from duty. Under 5 U. S. C. § 5544,
    employees must perform substantial work during
    meal periods to be entitled to overtime compen-
    sation and no entitlement accrues after employees
    are released from work.

V.  Department of Interior questions whether it may
    pay prevailing rate employees who negotiate their
    wages at higher rate of pay than their basic rate
    (penalty pay) during overtime where a schedulkd
    meal period is delayed or preempted. In effect
    this added increment of pay during overtime would
    constitute a special type of overtime or overtime
    on top of overtime which is not authorized by
    5 U. S. C. § 5544. An act which is contrary to the
    plain implication of a statute is unlawful although
    neither expressly forbidden nor authorized. Luria v.
    United States, 231 U.S. 9, 24 (1913). Hence, it may
    not be paid.

4.  Department of :nterior questions whether it may pay
    prevailing rate employees who negotiate their wages
    overtime compensation at rates more than one and


V

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most