About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-188946 1 (1977-12-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadfnc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

       I I





               tEIKO. THE COMPTROLLUR UENEMAL
0ECISIOPa                  OP   THE   UNITED      UrA.TE
                           WA    HINO  TON.   0. C, 30ag



FILE:   B-188946                 DATE:   December 23, 1977

MATTER   OF:   Miller's Sawmill, Tnc.


D!GEST:

     Despite bidding patterns experienced by Forest Service
     indicating wide variation in bid prices for timber, con-
     tracting officer was on notice of the possibflity of mistake
     where contractor's bid for pine sawtimber was approxi-
     mately 100 percent higher than the s@praisal price and
     53 percent higher than th next highest bid; where con-
     tractor's bid for oak sawtimber was 144&percent higher
     than the appraisal price and 22 percent higher than the
     next hIghest bid; ,and where total price bid was 25 percent
     higher than next highest bid.

     Miller's Sawmill has requested relief from a mistake in its
 sealed bid on the Forest Service, Department of Agriculture's
 Bear Pen Timibec Sale No. 18., The facts of the case are not
 in dispute, afidthere is no evidence that Miller's Sawmill made
 other than a bona fide, unilateral mistake as o the price it bid
 on the sale. GerTgCondodemetraky,  B-188'105, March 10, 1977,
 77-1 CPD 182 states the general rule as to unilateral mistakes
 as follows:

    The gerieral principle applicable to this case
    is that a purchaser's unilateral mistake in bid
    will not e:rcuae him from a contract subsequently
    avtrded ur less the contracting officer kne-v or
    .iuid havr known of the mistake. Corbiniri
    . Coritracts 6  610; Wender Presses, Inc. v. ,,United
    States, 43 F. 2d 961 (Ct. Cl. 1955); Saligman
    v7rn   d States, 56 F. Sufp. 505 (E.D.1. en.,
    1944; Kem  v. Tnited States, 38 F. Sipp. 568
    (D. Md., ;41).       AsFto when the contract-
    ing officer should be charged with constructive
    notice of error, the test Is one of reasonable-
    neas; whether under the facts of the case there
    were any factors which should have raised the
    possbility of error in the miid of the contracting
    officer. See Acme Refining-Smelting Company,
    B-181967, August 20, 1.974, 74-2 CPD 10. The
    possibility of error must be sufficient to rea-
    sonably require the contracting official to make

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most