About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-188997 1 (1977-11-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadfkg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


II



                                                            :)hn Carter
                                                                     PL I
                  P -1. THE CCMPTROLLER 'F                _AAL
  DECISION            .J    . OF   THE    U N ITE 0  b'rATB
                              WASH4IN   GTO  N.  0.   . 205  48




  FILE: B-188997                    DATE: November   23, 1977

  MATTER OF: Logic Systems


  DIGEST:

     1.   Allegation that agency evaluators failed to consider
          blanket offer of compliance with specifications in
          evaluation of proteiter's proposal is not persuasive
          evidence of bias where requeat for proposals states
          that such blanket offers would be considered inadequate.

     2.   Technical clarifichticn questions to offerors in
          competitive range do not provide evidence of bias in
          evaluation where most questions are substantially
          similar and those questions which are different relate
          to aeficiencies noted in individual proposals.

     3.   ProLest of relative weight given to evaluation factors
          made after receipt of Initial proposals and award is
          timely where protester was not advised of relative
          weight until receipt of documents from agency and protest
          was made within 10 working days thereafter.

     4.   Evaluation of offeror's understanding of a procurement
          based on proposal's response, or lack thereof, to each
          of the requirements set forth in the specification and
          the nature of chat response, e.g., whether a specific
          technical approach was proposed or merely an offer of
          compliance without detail, is not so inherently subjec-
          tive as to be arbftrary.

     5.   Contracting agency has the responsibility of determining
          the relative merit of proposals. GAO will not question
          such a determination absent a clear showing on the record
          that it is unreasonable, e.g., has no rational basis.
          Mere allegation of prejudice is not sufficient showing.
          Where protester Is unable to meet its burden of affir-
          matively showing bias and unreasonable evaluation,
          protest is denied.

     Logic Systems (Logic) protests the award of a contract to Zeta
Research, Inc. (Zeta), under request for proposals (RFP) N3. N00421-
76-R-0275 issued by the Naval Air Station (NAS), Patuxent River,
Maryland. Logic's protest is premised on contentions that the evalu-
ation of proposals was prejudiced and that Logic was dcnied an equal
opportunity for its cechnical presentation.

                               -1  -


I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most