About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-189678 1 (1977-12-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadfjq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

S


49L0 L8A  4
frr  7:,


DECISIOi


FILE: B-169678


THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
OPTHE UNI TEC UTATES
WAUHINGTON. D.C. 20549




       DATE: Deamber 20, 197{


0\


I


MATTER OF:Maureen Barry - Compenation - Retroactive Promotion


DIGEST:     Agency improperly evaluated employie's
            Frior experience thereby causing delay
            in  employee's promotion. Employee is
            not entitled to retroactive promotion.
            The error did not prevent a personnel
            action from taking effect as originally
            Intended.  Nor was the employee deprived
            of a right granted by statute or regula-
            tion and no nondiscre;ionary agency
            regulation or policy was violated.

     This decision responds to a request from Mr. George C. Putnam,
Assistant Regional Director, Administration and Management,
Department of r'ealth, Education, and Welfare (HEW) Region III,
concerning the entitlement of Ms. Maureen Barry to retroactive pro-
motion and baLkpay.

     Ms. Barry is an employee in the Social Security Administra-
tion's District Office in Norfolk, Virginia. Oa May 14, 1976,
the District Manager of the Norfolk office submitted a request for
Ms. Barry's promotion from Claims Representative, GS-5 to GS-7, to
be effective June 6, 1976.  The Regional Personnel Office in Phila-
delphia disallowed the promotion oi the basis that Ms. Barry did
not have the one year of specialized experience at the GS-3 level
which is a prerequisite for promotion to the GS-7 level of that
position.  The District Manager resubmitted the promotion request
after a discussion with the Personnel Officer during which he
pointed out that Ms. Earry had met the specialized work experience
requirement through a job she had held in private industry from
August, 1972 to October, 1974. The Personnel Officer rejected the
second request, statirg that, although she had overlooked that
experience, her wagea at that time equated to wages at GS-3 level
in Federal service and cannot be considered as qualifying at the
GS-5 level for promotion to GS-7.

     On July 23, 1976, the District Manager wrote to the Personnel
Officer and included copies of Ms. Barry's application for employ-
ment which apparently described her prior job experience. He con-
tested the basis of the Personnel Officer's decision and requested


a





  V












  t


I


7   j

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most