About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-189378 1 (1977-12-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadfjc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 







cu   WII  0I~N


FILE:  5-169318

MATTER OF:


DIGEOT:


     This action is in response to a letter dated June 2, 1977-,
from Mrs. Mildred Gross requeiing'etonsideration-of  our Claims
Division Settlement Cartificate, Z-2558519. dated February 11, 1976,
disallowing her claim for backpay for 4he period October 4, 1971,
toJune  30, 1972, whileshe  was employed in a temporary position
as a clerk-ypiat'with  the Department Bi the Army, Fo:t Hamilton,
New York.  Mrs. Gross states that her claim is based, inter alia,
on discrimination in employment and hiring practices, and equal
rights in employment. She contends that this issue was not resolved
in the di3allowance of her claim, and she requests a hearing in
order to substaatiate her claim of discriminatory employment
practices.

     Before dealing with Mrs. Gross' claim, we must point out the
manner in which claims are decided by tis Office.  We do not hold
hearings.  We decide ciaims based upon the written record that is
before us.  It, is incumbent upon a claimant to supply full sub-
stantiation of his or her claim. If there is a factual disy'te in
the record that c.nnot be resolved witri't an adversary hearing, ie
resolve such disputes in favor of the Government. B-186760, June 3,
1977.


V.-


I


1in


L


I


-ii


I


        , N   THE  COMPTPOLLR cE
              OP   THE UNITED STATES
               WA  HINaTON.       D.C.   *054U



                    DATE:   December 6, 19

Ndlared Gross - High'st Previous Rate


1.  Employe.'s claim for retroactive salary
    increase based on highest previous rate
    is disallowed Jince, the decision to hire
    employee at her highest previous rate is
    discretionary with'hiring agency. Here
    agency had not relinquished that discre-
    tion through adoption of mandatory policy
    or administrative regulation at time
    employee was hired.

2.  Employee alleged discrimination in agincy's
    application of hfghest previous rate rule.
    If she belh ved that there had been dis-
    crimination-on basis of race, colar, reli ion,
    sex, or natLonal origin, she should have
    pursued remedy thrrugh agency's Equal Employ-
    ment Opportunity Office under 5 C.F.R. Part 713
    (1977).


I


I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most