About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-189717 1 (1977-11-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadfix0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 






II



   COf
                                           THE  COMPTROLL.ER      OENERAL
              DECISIClN          .'t. OF        THe    UNITen      ETATES
                                           WEVA  HINGTON       D.C.   R05413

-:t

              FILE:   8-189717                    DATE:   November 30, 1977

              MATTER OF: William Fettijohn - Holiday Premium Pay


              DIGEST:     Employee receiving annual )remium pay under
                          5 U.S.C. § 5545(c)(1) at a rate determined in
                          accordance with 5 C.F.R. § 550.144(a) who per-
                          formed work on seven holidays falling within
                          his regularly scheduled tour of duty is not
                          entitled to holiday premium pay for such work.
                          56 Comp. Gen. 551 (1977).

                   By letter dated January 9, 1976, Todd .d.Summers, an accounting
              and finance officer for the Defense Supply Agency, requests an
              advance decision concerning the holiday pay entitlement of
              Mr. William Pettijohn. Mr. Petrijohn has submitted a claim for
              holiday premium pay for work performed on seven holidays within
              the period from February to November of 1975.

                   The claimant is fire Chief at the Defense Depot, Tracy,
              California, and ii; paid 15 percent annual premium pay t'nder the
              authority of 5 U.S.C. § 5545(c)(1) based upon his schedule of work
              requiring him to perform two 24-hour shifts per pay period. For
              work performed on the seven holidays falling within his regularly
              scheduled tour of duty, Mr. Pettijohn has received no compensation
              in addition to his annual premium pay of 15 percent. He now
              claims holiday premium pay for such holiday work based on the
              rationale of 54 Comp. Gen. 662 (1975). Since that decision ad--
              dresses the questiot of charging anpual leave for holidays to
              employees receiving premium compensation under 5 U.S.C. 5 5545(c)(1)
              and does not specifizally deal with the question of payment of
              holiday premium pay tor work on holidays falling within the regu-
              larly scheduled tours of duty of such employees, the certifying
              officer questions the propriety of paying Mr. Pettijobn the
              $224.86 amount claimrd.

                   The decision on which Mr. Pettijohn relies, 54 Comp. Gen. 662,
              supra, was overruled by 56 Comp. Gen. 551 (1977). The latter de-
              cision zecognize3 that where the rate of premium pay is determined
              in accordance with 5 C.F.R. § 550.144(a) and without approval of
              a special rate by the Civil Service Ctmmission based on L, tour of
              duty excluding holiday work under 5 C.F.R. 5 550.144(b), tha rate


I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most