About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-189578 1 (1977-10-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadfeh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                                                  / etcu)

                         - THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION                 .   P  'THE  UNUTEC STATRE
                           WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



FILE:    B-189578                DATE:   Octobar   1M 19''

MATTER   OF:    Cubic Western Data, Inc.


DIGEST:
    InvitatioA requirement for submission of test data to eiable
    grantee to determine competency of bidder to perform con-
    tract relates to bidder responsibility, and bidder's alleged
    failure to furnish complete test data with bid does not render
    bid nonresponsive.


    On March 28, 1977, the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit
Authority (MARTA)  issued invitation for bids (IB) No. CQ 210
for the design, furnishing and installation of the fare collection
ystem   for MARTA's Rapid Rail Transit System. The procure-
ment  is to be funded in substantial part (80 percent) by a granc
from  the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA),
Department  of Tran'sportation, pursunt to the Urban Mass
Transportation Act of 1964, Pub. L, 88-365, as amended,
49 U.S. C.  S 1601 et sew

    Four bids were received in response to the solicitation.
Duncan 'Industries (Dlican), a diyision of Qonnar Corporation,
submitted the low bid of $3, 72 6,150. The next lowest bid,
$3, 749, 614, was submitted by Cubic Western Data, Inc. (Cubic).
MARTA   determined that, Duncan's bid was nonresponsive and
requested UMTA's  concurrence in an award to Cubic. UMTA
believes Duncan's bid is responsive and disapproved the
proposed award to Cubic.

    On July 12, 1977, Cubic filed a coinplaint with this Office
a&:inst any award to Duncan. On July 25, 1977,- MARTA
rejected all bids'inider the IFB because of a purported technical
deficiency in the public notice of the advertisement for bids and
to avoid 'protracted administ 'tive and judicial prodeedings and
qther costly delays.  On thn following day, Duncan! filed an
action in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Georgia (Qonnar Corporation v. The Metropolitan
Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority. Civil Action No. 77-1218A)
seeking to compe  IARTA  to award a contract to Duncan. We
then dismissed Cubic's complatnt in accordance with our policy
of declining to rule on matters involved in litigation in the courts
unless the court expresses an interest in receiving our opinion.

                           .-1-







       I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most