About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-187441 1 (1976-11-12)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadego0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



*41
                                 il
          CO                             THE~ OOMPCMI-1iDLL;f   DEMaPAL
rJ            FiE3CIS1CI11    *        . OF   THE   IJNITED STATfU
C                                   -.   WASHINGTON. D.C. 20540



              FILE: B-187441                    DATE:    November 12, 1976

              MATTER   OF:  Creative Printing, Inc.

              DIGEST:

              1. GAO lacks authority to allow modification of con-
                tract price based solely upon contractor's claim
                of hardship.

             2.  Request for modification of contract price due to
                alleged error in bid claimed after award cannot be
                allowed when contracting officer adequately dis-
                charged bid verification ,uty by calling to bidder's
                attention variance in bids received and bidder
                verified bid.

             3. Where  low bid Is 75 percent o( next low bid, enforce-
                 ment of contract at that price is not unconscionable,
                 since mistake is not so great that Government can be
                 said to be obviously getting something for nothing.


                 On the basis of a mistake in bid alleged after award, Creative
             Printing, Inc. (Croative) requeste modification of its contract
             awarded under jacket (IFB) No. 217-700, issued by the United
             States Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, D. C,
             Creative does not contest the issue of whether a legally enforce-
             able contract exists, but rather asks for relief based upon hard-
             ship. However,  our Office lacks the authority to grant relief
             based solely upon hardship. Day v. United Slates, 245 U. S. 159
             (1017); Damascus Hosiery Mills, Inc., -182406, June 3, 1975,
             75-1 CPfT 336,  eWT,   liowever, examine the record for grou-uds
             upon which legal relief might be based.

                Creative's director of sales was present at the bid opening on'
             August 18, 1976, when Creative submitted the lov bid of $39, 873.
             The two othdr bids received were $53, 039 and $59, 283. Since
             Creative's bid was substantially (appro>;inatvly 25 percont) lower
             thain the next. )owest hid, the contracling officer requettd fint
             CrELi.v re  inw and verily its hibid beennae of tiF hal:udial
             vrkne. Croative vU  eified its bitl h,; tolk-ph.w (. At(*ii lI, 1:7':,
                 u~nl set  leterof verificW ic.-, on i&.mQWLi hwll
             \P L LU  i t O Oil !I (.fl i,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most