About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-187405 1 (1977-03-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadedz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




L. -


                                              William hubert
                     0ta                         Civ.Pera,
                6          THU  COMPTNOLIM ORNERAL
CECIUION .                 Op   TmH   UNITEo ETATE
                           WAUHININTON. 0.C.  00548


-4
Cl


PRILE:  B-1

MATTER 0

DIGEST:


87405                 DATE:     Wrc  22, 1977

F;   Dwight L. Crumpacker  - Arbitration Award
     of storage expenses

 Arbitrator found that agency clearly
 intended to transfer employee but
 that travel orders were not executed
 since agency selected employee for
 another position prior to intended
 transfer. Employee may be rei-
 bursed stoi'age expenies incurred
 in anticipation of transfer based
 upon arbittfator's determination thit
 expenses were incurred at time
 agency clearly intended to transfer
 employee and that transfer was not
 effected chly because agency selected
 employee for anoth.'r position.


    The Department of Transportation, by letter of September 10.
1976., and the Federal Labor Relations Coincil, by letter of
January 7, 1977. have requited an advance decision on the
1egaiity of a payment orderid by an arbitfator in theznatter of
Pr6fessional. Air Trafficontrcllers Orghiz'ation and Federal
Aviation Adra inistration,. Department of Transportation (Walsh
Arbitrator), FLRC NO.  7,AP-_98. The awawr in izestion directed
the Federal Aviation Admhistration (FAA) to pay to Mr. Dwight L.
Crunipacker, an FAA  em  loyee. the sum of $250.41. representing
the temporary storage costs of his household goods for 60 days.
The crAse is before the Couni-il as the result of a petition for
reviewfiled by the'Departimnint of Transportation alleging that
the arbitrator's award violated applicable lawa, and regulations.
The Department's letter to us alleges that the payment of the
award of temporary storage costs may not be made under the
pertinent provisions of the Federal Travel Regulations because
the grievant was not transferred from one duty station to another.

    In considering this mratter, our review shall be limited to
the legality of the arbitration award insofar as it concerns the
interpretation and i4plication of pertinent laws and regulations.
We  will not rule on any other issue pending before the Federal
Labor Relations Council.

    The facts.as found by the arbitrator are as follows.
Mr.  Crurnpacker entered on duty with the FAA on March 16, 1975.


I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most