About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-186090 1 (1976-11-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddze0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

'4jeU-h<L- vnt~eg
   C¼c.   ,iZ


A. TLD


THS  COMPTLiALRl GENERAL
0F   THt L)   NI   E  STAT Es
WASHINGTON. 0. C. 20i48


FILE:   D-186090


LIATE:  November 8, 19T6


MATTER DF. Thomas R. Smith -- Claim for per diem
              near official duty station


DIGEST:


Employee  stationed at JFK Airport, New York, is
detatled for 10 days temporary duty with free
Lodging, but he incurs subsiste.ce expenses in
Manhattan, New York City, while serving on
protective mission.  However, absent specific
statutory authority, employee is not entitled
to subsistence or per diem at official duty
station regardless of any unusual working
conditions.


     This action is in cesponsi to the request for an advance decision
from Mr. Duncan Calcete, an authorized certifying officer of the United
States Secret Service, Department of the Treasury, reference 300.0,
regarding payment of the travel voucher of Mr. Thomas R. Smith, an
employee of the U.S. Customs Service, for a reduced per diem for a
period of temporary duty perfirmed near his official duty station.

     The record indicates that Mr. Smith, a Special Agent with the
U.S. C--toms Service assigned to John F. Kennedy Airport in New York,
was deta.led to the U.S. Secret Service from October 5 through
October 15, 1975, on a protective mission. The submission from the
authorized certifying officer states that while on such a mission, an
agent is required to remain in close proximity of the protectee, even
during his off-duty houcs. Mr. Smith has claimed per diem for sub-
sistence expenses incurred in Manhattan, New York City, where he wis
granted free lodging, even though his official duty station is JFK
Airport and his residence is located on Long Island, New York. The
employee states that all Special Agents from Long Island were requested
to remain in New York City during the mission. The authorized certifying
officer questions whether the employee is entitled to pet diem under
such circumstances.

     Our Office has consistently held that absent specific statutory
authority, an employee may not be paid perdiem or actual subsistence
at his headquarters or place of abode from which he commutes daily
to his official 6uty station regardless of any unusual working
conditions involved.  See Federal Travel Regulations (FPMR 101-7)
para. 1-7.61 (May 1973); and B-182586, December 17, 1974 and cases
cited therein.


DECIION

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most