About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-186252 1 (1976-10-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddyi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


L d. 4


C:)                                         THE  CIMPTROLLER GNERAL
0             DECISION               -/  *OF     THE    UNITt1D      STATEU
                                            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20fi40



              FILE;   1-186252                     DATE:   October 20, 1976

              MATTER OF;       Noel Jo Raufaste, Jr. - Long distance
                               telephone calls

              DIGEST:     Employeq of National lvzeau of Standards
                          claimed payment for long distance telephone
                          calls front Philippine Islands to residence
                          in Maryland,  Employee stated calls were made
                          to residence as agency office was closed due
                          to time difference and information was relayed
                          to office later,  Payment may be made only if
                          an agency official designated under 31 U.,C.
                          680a determines and certifies thc.t calls were
                          on public business and in interest of Government.


                 Ms. Emma Axtine, an authorized certifying officer, National
            Bureau of Standards, Department of Commerce, by letter of MInrch 30,
            1976, has requested an advance decision regarding the propriety
            of certifying for payment the claim of Mr.  oel J. Raufaste, Jr.
            for long distance telephone calls from the Philippine Islands to
            his residence in Maryland while traveling on official business.
            Mr. Raufaste states that the telephone calls involved official
            business, i.e., the status of agency activities in the Philippines,
            and were made to his residence instead of his office because his
            office was closed due to the difference in time.  The statrus reports
            were then communicated to his office.

                 31 U.S.C, 680a (1970) requires tjat long distaace telephone
            calls must be for the transaction of public busineas and that a
            head of an agency or his designee certify that such calls are in
            the interest of the Government before payment thereof 13 made
            from appropriated funds.

                 There is no evidence in the record before us to indicate that
            the certification requited by the statute has been obtained. The
            travel voucher submitted by Mr. Raufaste on September 24, 1975, is
            the earlier Standard Form 1012 which does not contain a certification
            for long distance telephone calls.  The reclaim travel voucher, which
            he submitted on March 15, 1976, is the revised SF 1012, August 1970,
            containing such a certification for approval by a designated officer,
            but it is not signed.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most