About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-187508 1 (1977-03-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddwx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                                                   Nb. Haubert
                                                     Civ.Pers.
                 S        =   MTHE COMPTROLLEr          N IERAL
DIECIBION . .tiZ. OP THE UNPTUe-6      ATUU
                  S   4   -WAUaHINTON,            .      0546



FILE:  B-187508                  - DATE: arci 22, 197

MATTER OF: Gary E. Ar. Temporary storage


Transferred emplc.)ee was authorized temporary
storage atcommuted rate.  Although actutl
expense method may be used in intrastate
transfers where unusual hardship to em-
ployee may result, since no administrative
determination was made to authorize actual
expense method, there is no authority to
pay storage expenses in excess of those
allowable under commuted rate system authorized.


     By a letter dated Septnee; 21, 1976, Ms. Orris C. Huet,
an authorized certifying officer of the Department of Agriculture,
requested our decision zoncerning a voucher submitted by
1.  Gary E. Aho, an employee of tht Soil Conservation Service,
reclaiming $176.50 for excess charges for temporary storage of
household goods incident to a permanent change of station.

     The recora indicates that by a travel order dated March 4,
1975, Mr. Ahi was -transferred from Kalamazoo, Michigan, to
Escan&ba, Michigan.  T1 9 travel order authorized Mr. Aho to
transport h.'s household goods and personal effects at the
comniated rate. In connection with the transfer, Mr. Abo placed
10,000 pounds of household koods in storage at Escanaha from
April 11, 1975,,to May 8, 1975, and incurred expenses in the
amount of $658.50, the charge for storage of 30 days. The
claimant was administratively allowed reimbursement of $482,
representing the maximum permissible Tount under the commuted
rate system for storage of 30 days or less at Escanaba, Michigan.
t.  Aho has submitted a reclaim voucher for $176.50, representing
the urreimbursed portion of his storage expenses. He contends
that he should be paid in full since he was not advised that
under the commuted rate system he could not be reimbursed beyond
the amount determined under that system.

     Use of the commuted rate system for temporary storage of
household effects is authorized at 5 U.S.C. 5724(c) (1970)
which generally provides that a transferred employee shall be
reimbursed cn a commuted rate basis at properly fixed rates
under regulations, instead of being paid for the actual expenses
of temporarily storing hiP household goods and personal effects.


p.


%&CI


p


-t


0
0


I


DIGEST:


.a0t  - )


-E .-~-,


II

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most