About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-185201 1 (1976-01-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddtv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                             THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION          I V`7'     OF   THE UNITED         STATES
                             WASHINGTON, D. C. 20548




FILE:   B-185201                   DATE:     January 2, 1976

MATTER OF: Charles and Son Window Cleaning Co.


DIGEST:

1.   Where there was wide disparity between bids and price for
     prior year's window washing contract and low bid for current
     contract requiring substantially more work, contracting
     officer was on notice of error in bid for which contractor
     is entitled to relief since no valid and binding contract
     is consummated where contracting officer knew or should
     have known of error and neglected to verify bid.

2.   Although GAO would not object to relief for contractor
     that made error in bid, such modification should not
     exceed amount of next lowest correct bid.


     The Veterans Administration (VA) has requested our decision
regarding an error Charles and Son Window Cleaning Co. (Charles
and Son) alleges was made in its bid for window cleaning service
at the VetArans Administration Hospital, Perry Point, Maryland.

     Solicitation No. 641-21-75, issued on August 1, 1974, sought
bids for one (1) job to consist of two (2) washings of 2,182 windows
and frames.  Eight bids received at the September 12, 1974, opening
ranged from a low bid of $3,100 submitted by Capitol Building Services,
Inc. (Capitol), to a high of $28,900. Since the wide disparity in bids
indicated the possibility of a bidding error, the contracting officer
requested that the low bidder verify its bid. Verification by Capitol
was received by telephone that the bid price was correct and that it
intended to perform.  The contract was awarded to the low bidder on
September 30, 1974.  However, by letter dated October 21, 1974, the
low bidder advised VA that it could not perform the contract because
of its inability to obtain a performance bond. This was allegedly
due to the enormous differences in the bid prices. Therefore, VA
offered to accept other securities in lieu of the performance bond
required if it would complete the contract. No action was taken
by the low bidder, and on November 27, 1974, its contract was
terminated due to nonperformance.


- 1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most