About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-184228 1 (1976-01-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddto0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
,,, _- 1.


                   901OLLCR c0
                             THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION                     OF   THE UNITED STATES
                             WASHINGTON, O.C. 20548




FILE:    B-184228                   DATE:   January 2, 197

MATTER OF:       Porter Contracting Company                   cy


DIGEST:

  1. Failure to acknowledge material amendment to IFB which was
     received and acknowledged by all other bidders justifies rejection
     of bid even though bidder claims it was never received so long
     as there was no deliberate and conscious effort on part of
     agency to exclude bidder from competition.

  2. Bid which failed to acknowledge IFB amendment increasing
     Davis-Bacon wage rate was properly rejected as nonresponsive,
     since failure to acknowledge amendment was material deviation.
     Fact that work to be performed by craft listed in amendment
     (bricklayer) was not specifically required under specifications
     is immaterial as agency determined that, in course of contract
     performance, craft could be employed. However, recommendation
     made that procedures be instituted to assure wage determination
     modifications are reviewed to ascertain applicability to contract
     prior to inclusion in amendment.


       On May 8, 1975, the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda,
  Maryland (NIH), issued invitation for bids (IFB) No. NIH-75-B(91)-254
  for the renovation of laboratory modules. Porter Contracting
  Company (Porter) has protested the rejection of its low bid for
  failing to acknowledge amendment No. 1 to the IFB.

      Modification No. 2 to Wage Determination MD-75-3003 contained
  in the IFB was published in the Federal Register on May 9, 1975,
  and subsequently incorporated in amendment No. 1 dated May 21,
  1975.  This modification increased the wage rate for bricklayers.

       Following the opening of bids on June 4, 1975, a protest was
  lodged with the contracting officer by the second low bidder,
  Crystal Construction Company (Crystal), contending that amendment
  No. 1 was material and that the failure of Porter to acknowledge
  it rendered Porter's bid nonresponsive.

       Prior to ruling on the protest, the contracting officer
  inquired of the Construction Engineering Services Branch (CESB),
  NIH, as to whether a bricklayer would be required during the


                                                    PUBLISHED DECISIC
                                  - 1 -            .55 Comp. Gen.......

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most