About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-178551 1 (1976-01-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddtj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

1   &


FILE:    B-1

MATTER   OF


DIGEST:


7


  THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
*OF THE UNITED STATE
  WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20548


8551


DATE:   JAN


2 '.37 sI


:  Sammy  H. Marr  - Severance Pay, Attorney's
   Fees, Court Costs, and Real Estate Expenses
   Incident to an Erroneous Separation
1. Retroactive reinstatement and award of backpay
   under 5 U. S. C. § 559G (1970) incident to errone-
   ous separation precludes award of severance pay
   for same period since reinstated employee is
   deemed, for all purposes, as having performed
   services during period covered by erroneous
   personnel action.


              2. Claims for real estate and moving expenses
                 incident to erroneous separation are disallowed
                 because employee, under 5 U. S. C. § 5596, is
                 entitled to those payments or allowances which
                 he normally would have received if the unwarranted
                 personnel action had not occurred. Consequential
                 real estate and moving expenses are not such allow-
                 ances.

              3. Claims for attorney's fees and costs of litigation
                cannot be reimbursed in absence of express
                statutory authority. Although 42 U. S. C. § 2000e-5(k)
                (1970) authorizes a court to award attorney's fees
                in certain types of actions, judgment of District
                Court neither awarded costs nor attorney's fees.

    This action is in response to a reouest for reconsideration of our
Claims Division Settlement Certificiate No. Z-2459808, dated
August 28, 1975, which disallowed the claim of Mr. Sammy H. Marr,
an employee of the Department of the Air Force for (1) backpay in
connection with his separation from the Air Force; (2) severance pay
in connection with his separation from the Air Force; (3) attorney's fees,
court, and transportation expenses incurred in connection with
reinstatement litigation; and (4) real estate and relocation expenses
incurred as a result of his separation from the Air Force.

    The facts in this case are not in dispute. The claimant was a
Department of the Air Force civil service employee at Holloman Air
Force Base, New  Mexico, when he was ordered terminated from
his position on September 28, 1970. The termination was effected
by the Civil Service Conmission based on the provisions of a
regulation reduiring competitive civil service employees to be


DECISION


- `7


. .1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most