About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-185530 1 (1976-01-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddsy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                          Q  THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION                     OF   THE UNITED STATES
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548




FILE:     B-185530                 DATE:   January 14,1976

MATTER OF:         Franklin Industries


DIGEST:

          Rescission of sales contract for surplus property
          approved where bid was almost 400 percent above
          current market appraisal, more than 30 percent
          above acquisition cost, and more than .15 percent
          higher than next highest bid, since in such circum-
          stances contracting officer is charged with construc-
          tive notice of possibility of error and failed to
          request verification.


     Sale No. 27-6021 was issued by the Defense Property Disposal
Service, Defense Supply Agency, for the sale of surplus machine
tools and shop equipment. The contracting activity requests that the
contract (27-6021-326) awarded Franklin Industries on item No. 120 of
this sale be rescinded inasmuch as it believes that the contracting
officer was on constructive notice of the mistake in bid alleged by
Franklin after award..

     Twenty bids were received on item No. 120. These ranged from
the successful bid of $7,157 to $1.00. The second, third, and
fourth high bids were $6,106, $4,650, and $3,167.99, respectively.
The acquisition cost of the item (one turret lathe described as
used, in fair condition, and in need of repairs) was $5,443; its
appraised current market.value was $1,800. Franklin contends
that it intended to bid $2,557.

     The contracting activity states that it does not believe the
fact that the bid price of Franklin exceeded the acquisition cost
of the item placed the contracting officer on-constructive notice
of a mistake in bid since prices bid on machinery sales, in most
instances, substantially exceed the acquisition costs of each item.
However, it does believe that because the total bid price shown on
the face of the bid sheet did not reflect the sum of the individual
bids the contracting officer should have discovered this discrepancy
and should have requested verification prior to award of all bid
prices submitted by Franklin.


- 1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most