About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-185114 1 (1976-01-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddsl0001 and id is 1 raw text is: *ttL ER THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL DECISION - OF THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON, D. C.. 20548 FILE: B-185114 D DATE: January 22, 1976 MATTER OF: Wyman A. George DIGEST: Where bidder, after award, alleges that he mistakenly bid on Item No. 138 instead of Item No. 135 and bid was 11.88 times greater than second high bid, 14.12 times greater than current market appraisal established prior to bid opening, and represents a 57.2 percent return against ac- quisition cost for property in poor condition, contracting officer should have been on notice of possibility of error and should have requested verification. Consequently, contract may be rescinded without liability to bidder. The Defense Supply Agency, Defense Property Disposal Service, conducted sale No. 31-5322 to dispose of surplus vehicular equip- ment. The high bidder on Item No. 138 (gasoline engines) was Mr. Wyman A. George with a bid of $1,200. After award was made, Mrs. George, the wife of the bidder, advised the contracting offi- cer that an error had been made in her husband's bid. Mrs. George stated that her husband has two fingers missing from his right hand and that owing to this fact his figure five had the appearance of the figure eight. Item No. 135 was awarded to another bidder for $1,876.86. Where an error in bid is alleged after award of a contract our Office will grant relief only if the mistake is mutual or the contracting officer was on actual or constructive notice of the error prior to award. 48 Comp. Gen. 672 (1969). The test is one of reasonableness, whether under the facts and circumstances of the particular case there were any factors which reasonably could have raised the presumption of error in the mind of the contrac- ting officer. Wender Presses, Inc. v. United States, 343 F.2d 961 (Ct. Cl. 1965); D. G. Machinery & Gage Co., B-181230, January 27, 1975, 75-1 CPD 50. Under the circumstances of this case, it is our view that the contracting officer should have been aware of the possibility of error in Mr. George's bid and should have requested verification of the offer before it was accepted. - 1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most