About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-183247 1 (1976-01-27)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddsa0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





        L) D- T F LE                         UNIT00 GTATEM
                              WAlASHINGTON, 0. C. 005413




 FILE:   B-183247                    DATE:January  27,1976

 MATTER OF:      International Explosive Services, Inc.  /n


 DIGEST:

     Prior decision denying claim is affirmed where allegation
     by claimant that it was advised by State Department per-
     sonnel to submit proposal for reconstruction of Suez
     Canal is unfounded since evidence furnished by State
     Department indicates that any such contact with claimant
     was routine suggestion that to receive consideration
     -proposal should be submitted to Egyptians and, there-
     fore, claimant was mere volunteer not entitled to
     compensation.


     This decision is in response to a further request by Interna-
tional Explosive Services, Inc. (IES), for another recronsiderationi
of claim No. Z-2563200 in the amount of $53,92f8.77, plus late
charges, for expenses allegedly incurred in connection with a pro-
posed project for the reconstruction of the Suez Canal.

     IES initially based its claim on the fact that it attempted
to secure participation as a private contractor in the rehabilita-
tion and reconstruction project, but was precluded from entering
into commercial arrangements with the Government of Egypt when the
United States Government decided to perform these functions at the
United States' expense.  The Transportation and Clains Division of
our Office disallowed the claim on the ground that there was no
legal basis for liability on the part of the Government.

     By letter of February 3, 1975, IES stated that it was in
accord with the United States Government's policy of providing
the service to Egypt and it indicated that its claim was based
on the fact that the work was given to Murphy Pacific Marine
Salvage Co. (Murphy) by the United States without IES being pro-
vided an opportunity to bid.  By decision B-183247, May 13, 1975,
75-1 CPD 293, our Office held that since the United States had an
existing term contract (N00024-71-C-0234) with Murphy for the ser-
vices contemplated in the Suez Canal, competitive bidding on the
Suez Canal project was unnecessary.  On this basis the denial of
the claim by the Transportation and Claims Division was sustained.


- 1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most