About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-185717 1 (1976-04-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddoc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                    01.LER 0,
                           p THE   COMPTROLLER GENERAL
 DECISION                    OF   THE UNITED STATES
                              WASH   I NGTON. D.C. 2054




 FILE:        B-185717              DATE:   April 30, 1976

 MATTER OF:       Disposables Inc.                       9    ff9


 DIGEST:


            Where contract for coveralls was based on offer
            not conforming to RFP in that stitching in required
            sample was single instead of double and contractor
            has submitted same nonconforming offer on 10 RFP's
            in past which resulted in contracts, contract is not
            nullity.


     Disposables Inc. protested the award to Safety Consultants,
Hawaii, for coveralls negotiated pursuant to the public exigency
exception to advertising, 10 U.S.C. § 2304(a)(2) (1970), by the
Naval Supply Center, Pearl Harbor, under request for proposals
(RFP) No. N00604-76-R-0011.

     Paragraph F11 of the RFP specifications required the coveralls
to have French, double stitched seams. Paragraph F13 required
a sample coverall to be submitted with the proposal and stated that
the sample would be tested or evaluated to determine compliance
with the characteristics in paragraph Fll. Paragraph F13 stated
further that the failure to conform to all characteristics would
result in rejection of the offer.

     The basis for the protest is that the sample coverall furnished
by Safety Consultants did not meet the stitching specifications.
Based on a review of the situation made after the protest, the con-
tracting agency has advised that Disposables' allegation is correct.
However, the agency has stated that the contracting officer submitted
the Safety Consultants sample for technical review prior to award and
was advised then that the sample was in conformance with the RFP
specifications.  Further, the contracting agency has stated that
it considered terminating the contract when it learned bf the im-
proper award, but decided that it would be in the best interests of
the Government to allow the award to stand. The basis for the con-
clusion was that when the specification matter was brought to the





                                - 1-

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most