About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-185468 1 (1976-05-12)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddnh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                               TECOMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECSION                    .OF THE UNITED STATES
                             WASHINGTON. D. C. 20548




FILE:  B-185468                    DATE: May 12, 1976

MATTER OF: Hy-Gain Electronics Corporation           0)       rC


DIGEST:

      December 24, 1975, definitization of letter contract
      awarded on September 8, 1975 (which limited Government's
      obligation to $954,000 even though $2,385,000 had been
      committed for 15,000 units) did not amount to second
      award.  Therefore, protest against sole-source award filed
      more than 10 working days after protester was aware of
      award of letter contract and reason for sole source is
      untimely and prior decision is affirmed.


      This is a reconsideration of our decision in the matter of
 Hy-Gain Electronics Corporation, B-185468, April 13, 1976.
 In  that decision, we stated that Hy-Gain's protest against a
 sole-source award, which was filed on December 4, 1975, was
 untimely under our Bid Protest Procedures, 40 Fed. Reg. 17979
 (1975), since it was not filed within 10 working days after the
 date when Hy-Gain, by its own admission, was advised in a tele-
 phone  conversation with the contracting officer of the basis for
 the  award to Lapointe Industries, Inc. (Lapointe).

      Hy-Gain does not question the fact that an award was made
  to Lapointe for 15,000 antennas on September 8, 1975, nor does
  it question the fact that it was aware of this information on
  November 11, 1975. Hy-Gain does, however, contend that the
  September 8 award was a letter contract for a mere $945,000,
  and that it was only after the filing of the protest that the
  Government incurred a contractual obligation (December 24, 1975)
  for an additional $1,331,000. In the protester's words, This is
  so because there was no separate offer and acceptance involved in
  connection with the definitized or binding second contract entered
  into on December 24, 1975, following the written protest.

       In support of its contention that there were in fact two
  contracts awarded to Lapointe, i.e., one for $954,000 on Septem-
  ber 8 and another for the balance of the $2,385,000 contract that
  was definitized on December 24, 1975, Hy-Gain cites a memorandum


- 1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most