About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-186267 1 (1976-05-12)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddne0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                    0XILER c,
                            STHE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION         .       .   OF   THE    UNITED      STATES
                 a  .        WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548




FILE:      B-186267                 DATE:  May 12, 1976

MATTER OF:        Charles E. Weber & Associates


DIGEST:

          Contractor's request for an increase in contract
          price on grounds that its bid price did not include
          labor costs of subcontractor may be granted since
          contracting officer should have been on constructive
          ,notice of possible error in bid before award, where
          low bid was 23 percent below Government estimate
          and 48 percent below next low responsive bid, and
          there is no doubt as to intended bid. Consequently,
          contract may be reformed as administratively recom-
          mended to reflect intended bid.


     This decision is in response to a request from the Director,
Supply Service, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Veterans
Administration (VA) for a determination concerning the propriety
of permitting correction after award of a mistake claimed by
Charles E. Weber & Associates (Weber) in its bid for contract
V542C-166, issued by the VA. The contract requires Weber, as
successful low bidder on invitation for bids (IFB) 542-38-76, to
furnish and install metal and glass partitions in building No. 1
at the VA Hospital in Coatesville, Pennsylvania.

     Bids were opened on February 17, 1976. Three bids were sub-
mitted in response to the IFB: Weber's bid was $7,399; a second
bid, which was rejected as nonresponsive for failure to provide
a bid bond, was $9,984; and the third bid, the only other respon-
sive bid, was $14,067. The estimate on the contract provided by
the facility engineering service was $9,500. On February 24, 1976,
Weber, as low bidder, was awarded the contract.

     By an undated letter accompanied by several worksheets notarized
on March 23, 1976, Weber notified the contracting officer that the
cost of labor, which totalled $1,182, had inadvertently been left out
of its bid, and asked that the contract be reformed to include these
labor costs, for a total price of $8,581. The contracting officer
states his belief that Weber did fail to include labor costs in its
original bid, and the contracting officer and the VA both recommend
that favorable consideration be given to the request for a price
increase.


- 1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most