About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-182437 1 (1976-07-27)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddmb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                          C  THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISIll               d     OF   THE    UNITED       STATES
                             WA  SH  IN'G TON,   D.0.   2 0 5 4 8




FILE: B-182437                      DATE:    uy  27, 1976   Qi   7 'fo0

MATTER OF: Monitor Products Company, Inc.


DIGEST:

     Where unauthorized Government official induced claimant to
     complete another's contract by stating that claimant's
     justifiable excess costs could be reimbursed, payment of
     claimant's justifiable cost increases may be allowed on
     quantum valebat basis since agency now has ratified con-
     tractual relationship.  Claim is returned to agency for
     determination of whether value of items received exceeds
     any compensation received by claimant and for payment of
     any such amount.

     Monitor Products Company, Inc. has requested this Office to
require the Navy to return certain oscillators for which a claim
for payment was twice denied by this Office. See Monitor Products
Company, Inc., B-182437, March 12, 1975, 75-1 CPD 151 and October 9,
1975, 75-2 CPD 215.

     In our prior decisions we concluded that Monitor was a
subcontractor under a Government prime contract with Arvin Industries'.
Arvin was contractually obligated to deliver 160 oscillators to the
Navy at a stipulated price.  During the course of the contract, the
Navy considered increasing the contract quantity from 160 to 200
units.- Monitor, which was actually producing the items, indicated
to the Navy's project engineer that a substantial price increase
would be necessary for the additional 40 units as well as reim-
bursement for cost overruns which it was. incurring in producing
the initial 160 units; otherwise it would have to cease production.
The project engineer contacted a Navy supply officer who telephoned
the cognizant contracting officer requesting that a novation agree-
ment be entered into recognizing Monitor as the prime contractor.
The cognizant contracting officer then contacted Arvin in an attempt
to obtain a novation agreement and Arvin reported that it had re-
quested information from Monitor that was necessary to accomplish
the agreement.  Arvin also stated that Monitor was acting as its
subcontractor.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most