About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-184683 1 (1976-06-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddkw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                           THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECisiON ~OF THE UNITED STATES
                           WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549



FILE:  B-184683                  DATE:  June 10, 1976  90a

MATTER   OF:    Starline, Incorporated


DIGEST:

1.  Protest filed with GAO also filed before court will be
     considered on merits despite presence of several untimely
     issues, since court has expressed interest in GAO decision.

 2.  Although contractual matters are statutorily exempted from
     rule making provisions of 5 U.S. C. § 553, Secretary of
     Labor has waived reliance on that exemption for rule making
     by his Department, thereby necessitating Department of
     Labor compliance with statutory provisions.

 3.  Question of whether Department of Labor order extending
     Washington Plan (for fostering equal employment opportunity
     through Federal contractor affirmative action plans) is subject
     to rule making requirements of 5 U. S. C. § 553 is not appro-
     priate for decision by GAO since (1) it involves legal issue of
     first impression; (2) courts are not in agreement on effect.of
     noncompliance with such requirements; (3) Washington Plan
     extension has been regarded as effective; and (4) matter is
     pending before U. S. District Court. GAO will consider Plan
     bffective as of date of publication in Federal Register.

 4.  Requirement in solicitation that bidders commit themselves
     to affirmative action provisions of Washington Plan, even
     though Plan had expired by bid opening date, was proper
     since contracting officer had been informed that Plan would be
     extended and solicitations may provide for specific future needs
     and contingencies.

 5.  Where agency issues telegraphic solicitation amendment one
     day before bid opening and telephonically notifies bidders of
     that fact who, without objecting, expressly acknowledge receipt
     of amendment, one bidder's assertion that agency did not issue
     written amendment and did not provide bidders with sufficient
     time to consider amendment is without merit.


                                        pn1TBSTHED DECISIONT
                                        55 Cz:p. Gen.


-1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most