About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-186098 1 (1976-08-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddix0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                           p THE   COMPTROLLER GENERAL
 DECIggIgON      .         .  OF   THE    UNITED      STATES
                          /   WASHINGTON. D. C. 20548




 FILE:   B-186098                   DATE:  August 3, 1976

 MATTER OF:      Metal Trades, Inc.                          7VV


 DIGEST:

 1. Where procurement was not advertised in Commerce Business
    Daily, where protester was not sent invitation because it
    was not within geographical area to which bidders were
    restricted, and where there is no evidence that protester
    knew of procurement prior to bid opening, protest against
    alleged impropriety in solicitation will be considered
    even though as general rule it should have been filed
    prior to bid opening since protest was filed within 10
    days of when basis of protest became known to protester.

2.  Geographical restriction on location of bidders allowed
    to compete on procurement was valid where procurement is
    pilot program of interdepartmental agreement thereby
    necessitating close cooperation and regular inspection
    by cognizant agency personnel to solidify procurement
    policy for future procurements.


    Metal  Trades, Inc., protests the award of a contract for the
repair and overhaul of an Army vessel under invitation for bids
No. N62678-76-B-0076, issued by the Fifth Naval District, Ports-
mouth,Virginia.

     The basis of the protest is that Metal Trades believes it
unfair that the award for this work was limited to contractors
located in the Fifth Naval District (the solicitation required
that all contract work would be performed in that district),
since the vessel was located in Charleston, South Carolina, near
the protester's plant and outside of the Fifth District.

     Initially, the Department of the Navy contends that since
the protest concerns a matter apparent on the face of the invi-
tation our Bid Protest Procedures, specifically 4 C.F.R. § 20.2
(b)(1) (1976), require the protest, in order to be considered, to
have been filed prior to bid opening, which was not the case.
While the Navy has correctly stated the general rule, we do not
believe it is applicable under the present circumstances. The

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most