About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-184002 1 (1976-02-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddfx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                              THE   COMPTRLk-.LER GENERAL
  FICISION                  .OF THE        LNITED      STATES
                               WASH   INGTON. D.C. 20548




  FILE:                              IDATE:   FEB 19  1976
         B- 184002
  MATTER OF:
                 John J. Lynch - Restoration of Annual Leave
                 Due to Administrative Error
  DIGEST:
                 Employee retired effective December 31, 1974, and
                 received a temporary appointment effective January 1,
                 1975,,not to exceed June 30, 1975. Since there was
                 no break in service, the employee's annual leave
                 balance was transferred to his new appointment and
                 he forfeited 80 hours of annual leave at end of
                 leave year pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 9 6304. Agency is
                 requested to determine whether it violated mandatory
                 requirement to advise employee he would forfeit annual
                 leave if he accepted temporary appointment without
                 break-in-service.  If such violation occurred, leave
                 is for restoration under 5 U.S.C. I 6304(d.)(1)(A).


     This decision is made pursuant to a request by John J. Lynch, a
torier uafiloyee of the Department of the A-&y, that we revicw Settme
No. Z-2576307, April 25, 1975, wherein our Transportation and Claims
Division (now Claims Division) disallowed his claim for an additional
lump-sums payment for unused annual leave.

     Mr. Lynch retired from the Department of the Army effective
December 31, 1974. At that time he had an annual leave balance of
560 hours and a maximum annual leave carryover of 480 hours established
under 5 U.S.C. % 6304(c) (1970). Then Mr. Lynch received a temporary
appointment effective January 1, 1975, not to exceed June 30, 1975.
There was no break in service and Mr. Lynch's leave balance was trans-
ferred to his new position. See 33 Comp. Gen. 591 (1954) and 36 id.
209 (1956).  Accordingly, no lump-sum payment was made for the 56T
hours to his credit.  Instead, at the end of the pay period on
January 11, 1975, he forfeited 80 hours of annual leave when his
balance was reduced to the 480-hour carryover limit established in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 'a 6304(c).

     Mr. Lynch states that if he had not accepted the temporary
appointment upon his retirement he would have received a lump-sum
payment for the entire 560 hours of annual leave to his credit instead
of forfeiting 80 hours of annual leave. He, therefore, requests that
we reconsider our settlement of April 25, 1975, which disallowed his
claim.  Mr. Lynch believes that the Army's failure to advise him that
he would forfeit 80 hours of annual leave constitutes an administrative
error for the purpose of 5 U.S.C. %6304(d)(1)(A) (Supp. III, 1973).


                   PUJBLStD DECISIO11
                   SsComp. Gen. .*****2

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most