About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-183825 1 (1976-07-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddbs0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                             THE   COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION                     OF   THE.UNITED          STATES
                              WASH   INGTON.       .C.  2054B




FILE:   B-183825                    DATE:   July 2, 1976

MATTER OF: Joseph A. Chesanek


DIGEST:

     Complaint against cancellation of solicitation by
     local housing authority--recipient of Federal funds
     via annual contributions contract with HUD under 42
     U.S.C. § 1401, et seg.--is denied. Contract required
     local housing authority to comply with State and local
     law in procuring services. No basis is seen for con-
     clusion that it failed to comply or that any other
     terms of contract were violated.


     Joseph A. Chesanek has requested that we review a procurement
action of the College Park, Maryland, Housing Authority (CPHA) under
an annual contributions contract between CPRA and the Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

     HUD enters into annual contributions contracts with local
housing authorities under the U.S. Housing Act of 1973, as amended
(42 U.S.C. § .1401, et seq. (1970)), to provide financial assistance
for low-rent public housing. Under such contracts, HUD may permit
a local housing authority to engage the services of an independent
public accountant to conduct an audit.

     In the present case, CPHA solicited bids or proposals (the terms
are used interchangeably in the record) from independent public accoun-
tants to perform an audit of its books. Three proposals were received.
The lowest-priced proposal, submitted by J. K. Lasser & Company, was
unsigned and was rejected as nonresponsive. Mr. Chesanek's proposal
was second lowest.  HUD advised CPHA to reject all proposals, cancel
the procurement and resolicit, on the basis that HUD's Housing Manage-
ment Circular HM 7476.1, July 26, 1972, paragraph 8, required that
CPHA obtain proposals from at least three independent public accoun-
tants.  HUD interprets this provision as requiring at least three
responsive proposals.  Mr. Chesanek disagrees with HUD's interpretation.

     At the outset, we note that the Federal Government is not entering
into a contract with any of the accountants. Rather, the procurement is
by CPHA, a local housing authority receiving Federal funds under an
annual contributions contract with HUD. When the Federal Government


- 1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most