About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-186625 1 (1976-07-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddbk0001 and id is 1 raw text is:                                00,ER C
                               5 ~   ~THE   COMPTROLLER GENERAL
           DECISION              d     OF   THE    UNITED      STATES
                                       WASHINGTON,           . C. 20548




           FILE: B-186625                     DATE:  July 7, 1976

           MATTER OF: Schurr & Finlay,   Inc.


           DIGEST:

                Correction of contract price based on mistake in bid alleged
                after award is not permitted where difference between low
                bid, next low bid and Government estimate was not such as to
                have placed contracting officer on constructive notice of
                possibility of mistake in bid.

                The Department of the Army (Army) has forwarded for our
           decision,,the request of Schurr & Finlay, Inc. for correction of
           contract,No. DACAO9-74-C-0051 on the basis of an error of $23,984.59
           in bid alleged after award.

                The contract resulted from an invitation for bids (IFB) issued
           by the Army and opened on April 26, 1974. The IFB called for ex-
           pansion of the electrical distribution system at Yuma Proving
           Grounds, Arizona. Eight bids were opened with the three lowest
(          bids and the Government Estimate as follows:

                                                      Base Bid

                Schurr & Finlay, Inc.               $1,618,822.00
                Interstate Electric Co.             $1,741,448.00
                Sherwin Electric Service            $1,818,373.00
                Government Estimate                 $1,490,000.00

           Award was made to Schurr & Finlay on May 17, 1974.

                On October 24, 1975, and again on March 19, 1976, a
           representative of Schurr & Finlay discussed an alleged mistake in
           bid with Army personnel. Thereafter, by letter dated March 22,
           1976, Schurr & Finlay requested correction of a $23,984.59 mistake
           in bid and submitted worksheets and additional information as proof
           thereof.

                While it may be that Schurr & Finlay made errors in computing
           its bid price, the general rule with regard to mistakes alleged
           after award of a contract is that the bidder must bear the con-
           sequences of its unilateral mistake unless the contracting officer


- 1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most