About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-183670 1 (1976-01-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadczp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 








                               IB-183670] I1/J 9 /7(a
    General  Accounting  Office-Jurisdiction-Contracts-N.iiip
    priated Fund  Activities
    Since protested award of procurement pursuant to section 22(a) of
    Military Sales Act will not involve use of appropriated funds, matter is not
    ject to settlement by General Accounting Office and is dismissed.
    In the matter  of Tele-Dynamics,  Division of AMBAC   Indstne
    January  29, 1976:
      This  protest concerns a noncompetitive  contract award
    Department   of the Navy,  Naval  Sea Systems  Command (
    to Nelson  Electric Division of Sola Basic Industries under'
    for proposals No. N00024-75-O-4425(S).
      By  a letter received in this Office on December 12, 1975 from'n
    the Navy  raised, inter alia, a question concerning our jurisdic
    render an authoritative decision on the merits of this protes
    Navy  states that the transaction in the instant case represej
    cash sale of defense articles pursuant to section 22 of the
    Military Sales Act, as amended, 22 U.S. Code 2762 (Supp. III

          22(a) authorizes the  President, without requirement  for
          to any appropriation or  contract authorization otherwise
   oded to enter   into contracts to procure defense articles or services
     rash  ale to a foreign country upon a dependable undertaking by
       country to make available in advance sufficient funds to cover
       ents, damages, and other costs due under the contract.
    Jre  Navy  indicates that the instant transaction was based upon
          dependable undertaking  pursuant  to section 22(a), i.e.,
  1$dance payment. According to NSSC,  the contract costs are charged
k jainst  Navy's Foreign  Military Sales Trust Fund,  consisting of
       cyts made by foreign governments.
    From  the foregoing record it is sufficiently clear that this contract
      not involve payments from  appropriated funds. It is well estab-
        i that this Office is without authority to render authoritative
        ons with respect to procurements which do not involve expendi-
        eof appropriated funds. B-171067, March  18, 1971. Our  bid
     test jurisdiction is based upon our authority to adjust and settle
          and to certify balances in the accounts of accountable officers
    der31 U.S.C. 71, 74 (1970). Where we do nothave such settlement
      ,orityover the account concerned, we have declined to consider
      tests on the grounds that we could not render an authoritative
      on-on  the matter. See Equitable Trust Bank, B-181469, July 9,
            CPD 14 and Relco,   Inc., B-183686, May   5,, 1975, 75-1

         noG useful purpose would be served by our consideration of the
 4       idte protest is dismissed.


0  9 k  ou;   '?-

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most