About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-186331 1 (1976-09-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcyz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 






                             THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION         .           OF   THE UNITED STATES
                             WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20548

                                                    (Q5b
                                               SP   7978         gt
FILE:                               DATE:
        B-186331
MATTER OF:
                 Allen R. Lancaster - Claim for Environmental
                 Pay - Evidence to Support
DIGEST:
           In absence of official records, claim of
           Air Force employee for environmental pay
           for handling explosives may be paid under
           best available evidence rule to the extent
           that work schedules and flight schedules
           involving explosives substantiate employee's
           claim.  See decisions cited.

      Major C. T. Woolsey, Chief of the Accounting and Finance
 Division, Headquarters Oklahoma City Air Logistics Center (AFLC),
 Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, requests an advance decision as
 to the propriety of certifying for payment the voucher of
 Mr. Allen H. Lancaster representing evironmental pay. Mr. Lancaster
 is one of several employees who have filed claims with the Account-
 ing and Finance Division for environmental pay. The employees'
 eligibility for environmental pay is not at issue. However,
 due to a misunderstanding of applicable regulations, Air Force
 supervisory personnel did not maintain records of the time periods
 during which the employees were entitled to environmental pay.

      Mr. Lancaster's claim in the amount of $215.04 covers che
 period from April 15, 1973, through April 20, 1374. The claims
 of other employees cover periods of 100 to 276 days. Environ-
 mental pay for employees was authorized by subchapter S8-7
 of Federal Personnel Manual Supplement 532-1, as the employees
 handled Class A and B explosives aboard aircraft and participated
 in the onloading and offloading of said explosives.

      In the absence of official records documenting the times
 at which environmental pay was authorized, Major Woolsey inquires
 as to whether the claims may be paid based on the employees'
 own estimates of the number of hours worked or whether the Air
 Force should make its own estimate based on available records.
 The records in the instant case are the work schedules of the
 employees and the average number of flights per month carrying
 explosives which occurred during the employees' hours of duty.

      The rule with regard to evidence ±n support of claims is
 that in the absence of official records payment may be made on

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most