About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-185426 1 (1976-09-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcyq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



   ER *
~@0
~ -r


~
/f


B-185426


THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
OF   THE   UNITED STATES
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548


DATE:


P2  1 1976


MATTER   OF:


DIGEST:


   Major  Pedro J. Acevedo Torres, USAR


Where an Army  Reserve member  claims
entitlement to administrative function pay,
in the absence of an officially verified
showing that the member either commanded
a separate unit necessarily requiring the
performance of administrative functions
or that he actually performed the specified
administrative functions of a subordinate
unit, such claim may not be allowed.


    This action is in response to a letter dated March 15, 1976,
with enclosures, from Ismael Cardona, -sq., attorney for
Major  Pedro J. Acevedo Torres, USAR, which constitutes an
appeal from our Transportation and Claims Division settlement
dated March 5, 1975, disallowing the member's claim for admin-
istrative function pay for the period September 5, 1958, to
*D cember 31, 1968, during which the member was Complement
Commander   of, among other units, the 369th Station Hospital
(300B) MSC-USAR,   San Juan, Puerto Rico.

    In response to an earlier appeal on the same issue, we
advised the member on January 19, 1976, that since the matter
of his appeal was the subject of litigation in the United States
District Court for the District*of Puerto Rico, Civil Action
No. 75-1048, filed on September 18, 1975, no further action
would be taken on his claim pending the outcome of those court
proccedings. Those proceedings have been concluded-in favor
of the Government. The court in its February 26, 1976 opinion
and order dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction.
Since failure of a plaintiff to amend a complaint so as to bring
it within the jurisdiction of the court does not go to the merits
of the case, dismissal of suclyan action does not give res judicata
affect to judgment rendered for the defendant on jurisdictional
grounds.  See Takashi Kataoka v. May D partment Stores Co.,
115 F. 2d 521 (9th Cir. 1940), cert. denic-d, 312 U.S. 700 (1940).
Therefore, we may now rule on the present appeal.


Ii


I


DECISION


FILE:

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most