About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-182890 1 (1975-02-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcxf0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                           ~THE   COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION                     OF   THE UNITED STATES
                             WASHINGTON, 0.C. 20548




FILE:  B-182890                     DATE:   February 4, 1975

MATTER OF: Inter-Alloys Corporation


DIGEST:
1.   Allegation that low bidder is nonresponsible because of
     inadequate past performance will not be considered by
     GAO, since practice of reviewing bid protests involving
     contracting officer's affirmative determination of
     responsibility has been discontinued absent showing of
     fraud in finding; however, copy of protest has been
     forwarded to contracting agency and it is assumed that
     agency will consider allegation in responsibility
     determination of low bidder.

 2.  Allegation that decision of Government not to exercise
     option under prior contract, but to recompete same item
     under IFB in question, thus affording prior awardee
     opportunity to rebid option and obtain price increase
     per unit is not matter for resolution under bid protest
     procedures and will not be considered on merits. Appro-
     priateness of exercising option under prior contract is
     matter of contract administration which is function and
     responsibility of contracting agency.


     Inter-Alloys Corporation (I-A) protests the making of an
 award of a contract under invitation for bids (IFB) DAAK01-75-
 B-2038, issued by the United States Army Mobility Equipment
 Command, St. Louis, Missouri, to the G. W. Galloway Company
 (Galloway).  I-A asserts as the basis for its protest that the
 low bidder, Galloway, is a nonresponsible bidder because of
 alleged inadequate prior contract performance. Alternatively,
 I-A contends that the issuance of the IFB in question was
 improper, as the Government presently holds the option to
 purchase a specified quantity of the same items under an
 existing contract with Galloway. Therefore, I-A contends that
 the Government's decision not to exercise this option has given
 Galloway the opportunity to rebid its option and obtain a price
 increase per unit.

      For the reasons that follow, our Office must decline to
 consider either allegation on its merits.


- 1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most