About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-184321 1 (1976-07-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcxa0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                           W THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION -4/ . OF THE UNITED STATES
                             WAG   F IHINGTON    0  C.  20540




FILE: B-184321                      DATE:   July 14, 1976

MATTER OF: Dyneteria, Inc. (reconsideration)


DIGEST:

1.  GAO sees no distinction between claim of mistake in bid
    asserted by counsel for claimant and one asserted by
    corporate officer of claimant since both are agents for
    corporation and claim of error asserted by either is
    asserted on behalf of corporation.

 2. Even recognizing that estimates for subitems 4(a)(4)
    and 4(b)(3) were, unlike other subitems, to be bid on
    per pickup basis, in view of earlier decision that
    from face of bid intended unit prices were $10.64
    and $10.44 for all 4(a) and 4(b) subitems due to
    clerical error in multiplying intended unit prices
    by  12, and also 1,100 percent disparity between unit
    prices for 4(a)(4) and 4(b)(3) and Government estimate,
    contracting officer could have considered subsequently
    claimed error of unit price increase for 4(a)(4) and
    4(b)(3) by factor of 12 as apparent clerical mistake.

 3. While it is possible that apparently intended unit
     prices could be other than one-twelfth of those sub-
     mitted, when pattern of overstating unit prices by
     factor of 12 and fact that unit and extended prices
     were almost exactly 12 times Government's estimate
     are analyzed, it is clear that mistake was clerical
     and that resolution is apparent from face of bid.

 4.  Where there is apparent clerical mistake, the intended
    bid usually is determined from face of bid. However,
    where worksheets furnished to verify bid are in posses-
    sion of Government and are plainly inconsistent with
    what seems intended from face of bid, they cannot be
    ignored when to do so would usurp otherwise low bidder
    from  its standing.

 5. Not proper to make award to bidder where it appears
     that, if total prices had been divided by correct num-
     ber of pickups per year in calculating unit prices on
     worksheets, bidder would not be low, and it is also


- 1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most