About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-184345 1 (1975-10-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcuq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                 '    &      THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION         .    'J4,   OF   THE    UNITED      STATES
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548




FILE:      B-184345                DATE:   October 10,1975   l

MATTER OF:       Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company


DIGEST:

         Where ASPR § 2-407.6(a)(2), which applies to
         advertised procurements, was used in negotiated
         procurement to determine awardee between two
         equally priced offerors, but was incorrectly
         applied thereby leading to improper award,no
         meaningful corrective action may be taken as
         contract performance has been completed.
         However, corrective action is being taken by
         agency.


     Request for quotations No. F04699-75-Q-6222 was issued at
McClellan Air Force Base for the procurement of magnetic tape.
Although the tapes were on the Federal Supply Schedule and thus
procurement by formal advertisement would have been possible under
normal circumstances, it was determined that an oral solicitation
of quotations was necessary so as to permit timely delivery of the
items and to prevent a possible work stoppage. The contracting
activity confirmed its initial oral solicitation by telegram.
The firms, who had submitted prices orally, confirmed their offers
by telegram.

     Graham Magnetics, Inc. (Graham), and the Minnesota Mining and
Manufacturing Company (3M), small and large business firms, respec-
tively, submitted equally priced quotations. Since negotiations
were not otherwise called for, the contracting activity looked to
the provisions in paragraph 2-407.6(a)(2) of the Armed Services
Procurement Regulation (ASPR)(1974 ed.) (although this was not a
formally advertised procurement) to determine which firm should
receive award and determined that award, which was subsequently
made, should be made to Graham.

     It is the contention of 3M that the award should have been
made to it under the order of priority set forth in the applicable
ASPR.

     Regarding the determination as to whom award should be made
 when two or more equal low bids are received, the pertinent
 portions of ASPR § 2-407.6(a)(2) provide as follows:


- 1,-

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most