About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-184838 1 (1975-10-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadctp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                      'klER
                              THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
  DECISION        ..OF THE UNITED                    STATES
                         3    WASHINGTON, D.C. 20546
                      NITV


  FILE:                              DATE:   OCT  2 9 1975
          B-1848380`
  MATTER OF:      Francis A. Dorn - Severance pay following L
                   involuntary separation.
  DIGEST:
              Claimant, who was transferred from Milwaukee to
              Cleveland by SBA, vigorously pursued administrative
              appeals and otherwise indicated unwillingness to be
              transferred to another comuting area, both before
              and after date of transfer. After his grievance
              appeals within SBA were exhausted, claimant formally
              declined the transfer. SBA thereafter removed him
              for unauthorized absence. Claimant is entitled to
              severance pay under 5 U.S.C. 9 5595 and the Civil
              Service regulations thereunder, des2it-e fact he had
              reported for duty at his new pozt, because actual
              cause of separation was refusal to accept transfer.

     This action is a reconsideration of Settlement Certificate
  Z-563,  July 30, 1975, by the TreEsport*tin nd Clazim D)ivision of
the United States General Accounting Office, disallowing the claim of
Mr. Francis A. Dorn for severance pay.

     The record shows that claimant was employed as a Loan Specialist
in the Milwaukee Branch Office of the Small Business Administration
(SBA).  By letter dated March 25, 1974, the Regional Director advised
Mr. Dorn that he was being reassigned to the Cleveland District Office,
effective April 28, 1974, for the needs of the agency. On April 2,
1974, Mr. Dorn requested that the decision to transfer him be rescinded
or postponed, on the grounds that it was arbitrary and punitive in
nature and might jeopardize his chances for career advancement, and
stated that the transfer would be involuntary on his part. Claimant
advised that he would not resist a temporary detail to Cleveland pend-
ing his appeal of the transfer. The Regional Director, in a letter
dated April 15, 1974, denying his request, stated that the transfer
was essential for the efficiency of Region V and the Cleveland District
Office.  The direction transferring him effective April 28 was again
reaffirmed by the Regional Director in a telephone message dated
April 26, 1974.

     After complying with the transfer order, Mr. Dorn continued to seek
rescission of the reassignment through informal and formal grievance
procedures, adding personal reasons concerning his-family to his

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most