About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-185255 1 (1975-11-28)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcrg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                     I-ER ~
                              THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
 DECISION                   . O=   THE    UNITED      STATES
                              WASHI.NGTON. D. C. 20548




 FILE:   B-185255                   DATE:   November 28, 1975

 MATTER OF:      Commercial Metals Company


 DIGEST:

     Purchaser whose bid price for item 2 of $0.1709 per
     pound was 244 percent greater than next highest bid
     of $0.0698 per pound and 170 percent greater than
     current market appraisal of $0.10 per pound may have
     sales contract reformed by deleting item since con-
     tracting officer was on constructive notice of
     possibility of mistake in bid because of wide price
     variations which are not normally encountered in sale
     of scrap, and should have requested verification of
     bid before acceptance.


     This decision involves a mistake in bid by Commercial Metals
Company (Commercial) alleged after an award to it of item 2 (surplus
magnetic and nonmagnetic stainless steel), under sales contract
No. 41-5495-202. The Acting Assistant Counsel, Headquarters,
Defense Supply Agency, in concurrence with the Defense Property
Disposal Service, recommends the reformation of the sales contract
by deleting item 2 therefrom. The award on item 2, described as
75,000 pounds of magnetic and nonmagnetic stainless steel, was made
to Commercial on July 3, 1975, at their bid price of $0.1709 per
pound.  By letter postmarked July 2, 1975, and received by the
contracting officer on July 7, 1975, Commercial alleged a mistake
in its bid for item 2. Commercial alleged that the mistake occurred
during their prebid inspection when the material offered under
item 2 was confused with similar material offered under item 13
(22,600 pounds of nonmagnetic stainless steel scrap).

     Generally, when a bid has been accepted, the bidder is bound
to perform the resultant contract and must bear the consequences of
its unilateral mistake. Saligman et al. v. United States, 56 F. Supp.
505 '(E.D. Pa. 1944). However, our Office has consistently allowed
the recision of such a contract where a contracting officer having
actual or constructive notice that the bidder made a mistake neglects
to verify the bid. 37 Comp. Gen. 685 (1953); Ubique Ltd., B-180610,
August 12, 1974, 74-2 CPD 90.


- 1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most