About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-184798 1 (1975-12-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcqe0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                              Aa THE  COMPTR..'   ..LER GENERAL
       ECISION                   OF   THE    UNITED      STATES
                                 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548



    FILE:   B                          DATE:            7(0 0
                     5-184798DEC 111975
    MATTER OF:      Reimbursement of relocation expenses incident
                    to permanent change of station
    DIGEST:
        DIG T  Employee, transferred from Madison to bushnell,
               Florida, claims reimbursement for $275 paid as
               attorney's fee in lieu of closing costs in con-
               nection with purchase of residence at new duty
               station.  Reimbursement is not allowed since
               FTR para. 2-6.2(c) does not authorize payment
               of attorney s fe  in lieu of closing costs and
               amount in question includes legal costs for
               which payment is not authorized under the above-
               cited FTR paragraph.

     This action is in response to a letter dated August 13, 1975, with
enclosures, from Mr. Orris C. Huet, Authorized Certifying Officer,
United States Department of Agriculture, requesting an advance decision
as to whether a reclaim voucher in the amount of $275, in favor of
Mr. Johnnie Hill, Jr., an employee of the Department of Agriculture,
may be certified for payment,

     The record indicates that under Travel Authorization No. 09005,
dated August 3, 1975, Mr..Hill effected a change of official duty sta-
tion from Madison to Bushnell, Florida. In connection with this trans-
fer it is stated that Mr. Hill purchased a residence at his new duty
station.  Mr. Hill was reimbursed by his agency for $896.11 in reloca-
tion costs, including closing costs.

     Mr. Bill's claim for reimbursement of $275 paid by him as attorney's
fee in connection with the purchase of the residence at his new duty
station was suspended from payment for the reason that it was not sup-
ported by a statement containing a breakdown of the charges included
within that category.

     In reply to a request for an itemized statement, Mr. Hill submitted
a $275 reclaim voucher and a letter, both dated May 30, 1975, and both
containing statements further explaining this fee. The reclaim voucher
contained a statement by Hr. Hill indicating that the $275 for which
reimbursement was sought represented an attorney's fee for stopping
foreclosure on property bought in lieu of closing costs. An almost
identical statement was contained in the letter of the same date where
it was stateds



                       09  coluo-eD

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most