About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-184851 1 (1975-08-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcny0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
A , - 1


                              OF   THE UNVITED STATE:S
                           \/V  \A SH IN GTD N, 0D C . 2O05 4




FILE: B-184581                       DATE:August  19,1975    q-7

MATTER OF:       William R. Pfeifer, Jr.


DIGEST:

     In sale of surplus Government property where purchaser
     submitted identical unit and total bid prices for an
     item consisting of twenty-two pieces, contracting officer
     was on constructive notice of possible error in bid and
     should have sought bid verification, in the absence of
     which contract may be rescinded.

     The Defense Supply Agency (DSA) has forwarded for our
 decision the claim of Mr. William R. Pfeifer, Jr., that he
 made an error on one item in his bid submitted in response
 to invitation for bids (IFB) No. 27-5167, issued by the
 Defense Property Disposal Region, Columbus, Ohio, for sale
 of surplus vehicles and vehicular parts.

     Mr. Pfeifer was high bidder on item 335, which consisted
 of 22 each engine starters. Mr. Pfeifer submitted identical
 unit and total bids of $50.00 for the item and was awarded the
 item based on a unit bid of $50.00 for a total of $1,100.00.
 The second high bid for this item was $25.00 each. After being
 informed of the award, Mr. Pfeifer alleged a mistake in bid,
 asserting that the $50.00 was intended as a total and not a
 unit price.

      The contracting officer reports that she was not on notice
 of a mistake in bid prior to award due to the fact that there
 was no great disparity in the bids, and the fact that the unit
 and total were the same went unnoticed at the bid opening. As
 a result, she did not seek bid verification from Mr. Pfeifer.
 On that basis, DSA recommends that the contract be rescinded
 because the error is patent on the face of the bid itself.

      We agree that the error -is apparent on the face of the bid.
 While the general rule is that in case of a discrepancy between
 the unit and extended price in a bid the unit price will govern,
 this rule is for application only where the correction results


- 1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most