About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-183486 1 (1975-06-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadchq0001 and id is 1 raw text is:                   * 0.LE R  C
                  /      T  THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
 DECISION                   OF  THE UNITED STATES
                            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548
                   ( 'N I T E1


FILE:B-183486                     DATE: June   19, 1975

MATTER OF: Essex Electro Engineers, Inc.
               Cummins  Diesel Engines, Inc.

 DIGEST:

    Invitation for emergency standby power systems contained
    specification concerned with horsepower rating of engine
    needed to drive generator which was subject to conflicting
    reasonable interpretations. Where invitation so inadequately
    expresses Government's requirements as to ensnare bidder
    into submitting nonresponsive bid, invitation should be
    canceled and procurement resolicited under terms clearly
    expressing Government's needs.

    Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. (Essex), the low bidder under
IFB CG-52460-A,  protests the rejection of its bid as nonresponsive.

    The subject IFB was issued by the Department of Transportation,
United States Coast Guard for furnishing five emergency standby
power systems in accordance with Coast Guard Specification No.
950, dated December 17, 1974. On the March 4, 1975 opening date 12
bids were received and opened. Essex was low with a unit price of
$116, 880. The contracting officer determined that the four lowest
bidders were nonresponsive in that the engines offered to power the
generators did not meet the horsepower requirements of the speci-
fication. Two of these bidders offered engines identical to that
offered by Essex. .

    The Coast Guard informed Essex that its bid had been rejected.
Counsel for Essex disputed the Coast Guard's evaluation and requested
the agency to review its determination. The Coast Guard again eval-
uated the Essex bid in the context of Essex's arguments as to the
responsiveness of its bid and affirmed its determination to reject the
Essex bid. Counsel then timely protested to our Office. Cummins
Diesel Engines, Inc., has also protested the rejection of its third
low bid.

    This protest is concerned with the interpretation of the following
portion of the engine specification:

    The engine shall have a continuous horsepower
    rating (as shown by the engine manufacturer's
    published performance curves) of at least 10
    percent and not more than 25 percent in excess


                              1                 PUBLISHED DECISIOff
                                                -C 1-. Gen..

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most