About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-183496 1 (1975-06-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcgl0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                          STHE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISICJaN               * OF   THE UNITED STATES
                            WASHINGTON, 0.C. 20548



FILE:  B-183496                   DATE:    June 30, 1975

MATTER   OF:  Bendix Corporation


DIGEST:

1.   Contention that bid is nonresponsive because all pages of
     solicitation were not submitted with bid is without merit
     since bid incorporated by reference omitted material.

 2.  Contention that solicitation is defective because bid evaluation
     did not include certain option items and thereby encouraged
     unbalanced bidding is not supported where agency reports
     that there is low probability that option items will be exercised
     and that, therefore, option items will be deleted at time of
     award.  Furthermore, latter action is not objectionable since
     it has not been alleged or demonstrated that inclusion of option
     items in solicitation prejudiced any bidder on evaluated items.

     The Bendix Corporation (Bendix) has protested against the
 award of a contract pursuant to invitation for bids (IFB) A4M-4-7305,
 issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), to anyone
 other than Bendix. Basically, Bendix argues that the apparent low
 bid submitted by Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse)
 is nonresponsive because several pages of the solicitation are not
 contained in the bid and, furthermore, that it is materially unbal-
 anced. In addition, it is argued that the method of evaluation
 stated in the solicitation was defective.

     The IFB for the procurement of Air Route Surveillance Radar
 (ARSR-3) Systems was issued on February 19, 1975, pursuant to
 the two-step formal advertising procedures of the Federal Procure-
 ment Regulations. Bid opening occurred March 20, 1975. In its
 bid, Westinghouse failed to include 11 of the 12 clauses attached to
 the IFB as issued and listed on page 69 of both its bid as submitted
 and the IFB. Also, Westinghouse did not include a document entitled
 Contract Maintenance Service Requirements for Surveillance Radar
 (ARSR-3) which constituted attachment # 1 of the IFB and was the
 specification for Item 7 of Schedule III of the IFB.


-1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most