About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-179607 1 (1974-07-25)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadccm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 9


, S


Is.


q


                           AE TH  LDMPTROL.ER  LGENERAL
DECISION    '    OF TH UNITED STATE1
                             WASHIN'TON, D.C', 040
                    4s   4V


FILE %B-179607
             I


MATTER


DATE;  July 25, 1974


OF: Baganoff Associates, Incorporated


DIGEST: 1.    Protest that proposl  offering listed
          Canadian end product should have been
          evaluated pursuant to Buy Americtn Act.
          restrictions Is denied because regulations
          implimenting Act provide for waiver with
          respe't to listed Canadian and prducts
          andO01) has previously upheld DOD's dis-
          cretio   oin effecting waiver of restrictions
          and liting  products; moreover, action of
       t  Canadiai Commercial Corporation in wubmitting
          offer for Canadian supplier was proper under
          regulation.  In view of Congressional cogni-
        ot xance of Agreements between DOD and Canadian
          counterpart waiving Act's restrictions, and
          as Agreement covers matter concerning U.S,-
          Cpn*dian :alations, it is inappropriate for
          GAO to question regulations' propriety, See
          regulations and cases cited.


P3Y7

  V.
  Je


2'. GAO examI.ntion of technical and price
evalvation of  wardrp's proposal indicates
evaluation ia  rear**.ale and in accord with
stated evitluation iikt'.ta. Although selected
design has no operst~onal history or\ actual
cost basis, and has yet to undergo testing pro-
cedure, RFP cor.templated development contract,
including testing thereunder, and did not
require item to have been aircraft tested.
Furthermore, GAO finds record supports agency's
conclusion that successful offeror's low price
io reasonable because of unique design, type
of materials used, and employment of low cost
production processes; also, Canadian Comuercial
Corporation certified reasonableness of 'awardee's
prices pursuant to ASPR 6-506.


00


If


7Q9+4-3


3.  dAo finds no evidence in record to support
allegation that Air Force aided other offerors
in price revisions or that such revisionsre**
sulted from other than proper negotiation proc-
ess,   Although protecter contends time extenaion


c G~% -LESS-P


610~1 CbIEF44P &' SteC]C4 Qps


OcH-773


0 4


4?


p

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most